利益集团

一个利益集团，简要介绍其领导人、意识形态和特征以及政治地位。

利益集团是一群支持某些观点并想要使国家向这个方向改革的人的集合，所有人或从属于某个利益集团或处于 政治冷漠，而具体的利益集团倾向取决于多重因素，例如资质、财富和识字率等。不同人所属的利益集团取决于不同的标准，利益集团的具体观点也会随着当地宗教、社会运动和领导人的修正在不同国家间变化。值得一提的是，人群的不同个体可能支持任何一个利益集团，使得该群体支持所有的利益集团（尽管在支持人数上有差异）

基础利益集团 

利益集团系统是维多利亚三的核心玩法之一。游戏中共有八种利益集团，以及一个额外的政治冷漠：

• 地主
• 虔信者
• 军队
• 小市民
• 实业家
• 乡村民众
• 知识分子
• 工会
• 政治冷漠

一国内利益集团的名字会随着各自的情况变化，如暹罗的虔信者 被称作小乘佛教僧侣，日本的军队被称作武士（Samurai），俄罗斯的 地主 则被称为缙绅会议（Gentry Assembly）。

意识形态

主条目：意识形态

利益集团包含一系列的意识形态，这些意识形态决定了他们所支持和反对施行的法律——利益集团通常偏爱那些契合他们信念和使他们受益的法律。

不同的利益集团有不同的意识形态（例如地主明显比工会更加保守），但是这些并不是被定死的。利益集团的意识形态也会随着游戏的进程和领导人个人的偏好与意识形态而变化。

此外，一些利益集团在特定国家内会有独特的意识形态，例如支持儒家思想的 大清儒生利益集团。

利益集团的默认意识形态设置如下:

注: 利益集团的意识形态可能因国家或法律而异。例如, 如果该国允许奴隶制，地主将获得（无法识别“蓄奴主义者”，请查阅Template:概念）意识形态。

领袖意识形态

每个利益集团都被一个政治家领导，他们的个人主张影响着这个利益集团的立场和观点。这有时会使一个利益集团支持与其基础观点不同甚至完全相反的意识形态。

政治力量

人群中的个体会为他们所支持的利益集团或政治运动贡献政治力量，一个个体贡献的政治力量受到多个因素的影响而修正，其中的主要因素包括人群的财富和本国权利结构所赋予的政治地位（或投票权）。例如，在寡头制国家内，一个富裕的 贵族 的政治力量是一个贫穷的 劳工 的成百上千倍。

有些人群没有任何政治力量，这通常由于本国法律剥夺了他们的政治权力（例如人群的文化或宗教受到歧视，或妇女没有投票权）。他们“被排除于权利系统之外”，无法通过加入利益集团等正常方式要求改革，不得不依靠政治运动向政府施压。

吸引力

利益集团对人群存在一个吸引力权重，处于某个利益集团的人群可以为其提供政治力量。利益集团对人群的吸引取决于该人群的宗教、文化、是否受歧视、识字率、失业情况和职业，因此有的人不会进入特定的利益集团。利益集团对人群的吸引情况如下表：

	军队	虔信者	实业家	知识分子	地主	小市民	乡村民众	工会
Requirements	One of: Pop is not discriminated Pop's profession is Aristocrats, Officers, or Servicemen	Pop follows the state's religion	Country must be centralized	Pop's 识字率 is over 25% Country must be centralized		Pop has primary culture Pop is employed in Manufacturing, Service, Urban Facilities, or Government	Pop is employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations	Pop is not employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations Country must be centralized
Base Weight	0	25	0	0	0	75	50	50
Other Weight Effects	+25 if not discriminated	−2 per 10% Literacy over 50% except Clergymen		+10 if Literacy ≥ 50% +2 per 10% Literacy over 50%				Final weight multiplied by: x0.5 if not Egalitarianism x0.5 if not Labor Movement
职业
学者				+200
贵族	+50	+50		+50	+200
官僚				+100
资本家			+200	+50
教士		+200			+50		+100
职员				+100		+50
工程师			+50
农民					+50		+200
劳工								+50
技工								+100
军官	+200				+50
自给农		+50					+200
军人	+100
店主			+50			+200
奴隶

扶植和打压

除非国家已经颁布  保障自由, it can  bolster or  suppress interest groups, increasing or decreasing that groups attraction by some amount, as determined by its Free Speech law.

势力

一个利益集团内所有人群的政治力量之为这个利益集团提供势力——这决定了利益集团在国内和政府中的clout – the amount of political weight it can assert on the country and the government. 利益集团的势力等于集团内政治力量与全国政治力量的百分比。例如，如果全国人群的政治力量为100k而实业家 的政治力量为30k，他们的势力即为30%。

Clout determines the interest group's classification within their country – whether they are considered powerful, influential, or marginalized.

An interest group becomes marginalized if their clout drops below 4%, unless they are in government. They become influential again if it increases above 5%.

Similarly, a interest group becomes powerful if their clout rises above 20%, and influential again if it drops below 18%.

支持度

参见：政治运动

Summary of Approval Sources

Source	Approval
Law Stances
Strongly Approves	+2
Approves	+1
Disapproves	−1
Strongly Disapproves	−2
Law Changes
One step	±5
Two steps	±10
Three or more steps	±20
Pop political strength
Each ~6% loyalist	+1
Each ~6% radical	−1

Interest groups have a level of approval, which has two main sources: stances on laws, and pop loyalists and radicals. Other factors may affect approval as well, such as the player's choices in certain events. Total approval is capped between −20 and +20.

Each interest group and its leader's ideologies set its stance towards various laws from on a five-point scale, from Strongly Disapprove (−2) to Strongly Approve (+2). Approval from laws is the sum of all stances, capped at ±5.

In addition to the stance on enacted laws, proposed and recent law changes have an increased effect on an interest group's approval. A change which moves one step along their stance scale adds ±5, two steps adds ±10, and three or more steps adds ±20. This effect is added throughout the proposed change, and when a law is fully enacted, it remains and decays over five years. Cancelling the proposed law change immediately removes this effect. The effect of law changes on approval is not directly capped and can stack when changing several laws in a short time.

The percentage of pops supporting an interest group which are loyalists or radicals also affects approval, up to ±15 if all of the pops are loyalists or radicals. The actual approval effect is determined by the percentage of pop political strength, if more political strength comes from loyalist pops, it is positive; otherwise if more comes from radicals, it is negative. This scaled by the relative amount, for example if two-thirds (66%) is loyalist and one-third (33%) radicals, the approval effect is +5 as the loyalists provide +10 which is offset by the radicals' −5.

Government and military wages affect certain interest groups by ±1 for each step above or below normal wages. Government wages affect Intelligentsia and Petite Bourgeoisie approval, and military wages affect Armed Forces approval.

If a group is powerful and in opposition, their approval drops by −1.

Finally, there are many events, especially surrounding law changes, that add temporary approval modifiers to various interest groups.

效果

If an interest group's approval is −10 or less, they are Angry. They cannot be added to the government, but do not leave it if they're already in it. They also contribute their clout to the radicalization of any movement they support, possibly starting a revolution.

From −9 to −5, a group is Unhappy, activating their negative trait.

From −4 to +4, a group is Neutral, providing no special effect.

From +5 to +9, a group is Happy, activating their first positive trait. They also stop backing any movements.

At +10 or above, a group is Loyal, activating their second positive trait.

特质

Each group has three traits associated with it, one negative, and two positive. If group's approval is −5 or less, their negative trait is active. Approval of at least +5 activates their first positive trait, and +10 or more activates both of their positive traits.

Traits of a powerful group are twice as powerful, while marginalized groups cannot activate their traits at all.

利益集团	愤怒特质（支持度≤5）	满意特质（支持度≥5）	忠诚特质（支持度≥10）
地主	贵族特权 那个贵族履行责任且不用被税吏纠缠的时代哪儿去了？是时候重回旧日荣光了。 −10% Agriculture, ranching, plantations tax	亲族纽带 即使身处变革的年代，我们仍然明白一段美好婚姻的价值。人脉关系比他们跨过的国境线还古老，甚至比联盟和政府都存续更久。 +10% Influence	贵族义务 我们比普通人更优渥，这意味着我们有责任照顾他们。如果他们试图亲自张罗什么，那也是自取灭亡，注定要失败。 +10% Aristocrat investment pool contribution
	虔信小说 如今的价值观如此被毒害，文学如此腐败，以至于教育本身对道德产生了侵蚀作用。比起教人们当前体制认为“正确”的东西，更好的方法是教他们什么应该是正确的。 −10% State education access	君权神授 我们相信，我们的生活蕴含着内在的秩序；而社会对于这种秩序的映照，可以是更为良善的，也可以是更为堕落的。倘若统治者道德高尚、法令公平公正，我们的人民就必能知晓其中的道理。 +10% Authority	多子多孙 禁欲主义对于少数献身于精神追求的人来说是好的，但对于普通人来说，最重要的价值观是建立家庭和照顾孩子。 +2.5% Birth rate
	物资浪费 对国家的忠诚不等于对政府的忠诚。如果我们不能信任当权者，我们不妨按我们认为合适的方式使用给到我们的东西。 +25% Military goods cost	老兵咨询 技术进步正在改变战争的面貌，但我们只有对其充分了解，才能运用其精妙。幸运的是，我们这里有第一手经验的人，对此应该有所见解。 −10% Military technology cost	爱国热情 无论战略多么高明，武器多么先进，有些战斗只有靠努力和勇气才能打赢。那些真正相信自己国家所代表信念的士兵将不顾一切地勇敢战斗。 +15% Unit defense +15% Unit offense
小市民	排外 我们都知道谁应该为我们国家的现状负责，人们只是害怕说出来。与此同时，他们还在背后嘲笑我们让他们逍遥法外。需要有人采取行动。 −10% Influence +100% Radicals from discrimination	中层管理者 我们不能让每个人都照本宣科，但至少可以把做过的事情都记在书本上。总有人需要记住在这里做事的正确方式。 +10% Bureaucracy	国债 只要政府可以被信任会偿还债务，把我们辛苦赚来的积蓄用于资助这个伟大的国家不仅是爱国的，还是一项很好的投资。 −10% Loan interest rate
乡村民众	传统 这些管理国家的人似乎对未来应该是怎样有各种各样的想法。但既然是他们导致了现状，我们为什么还要相信他们呢？ −10% Tech spread	诚实工作 我们靠诚实的工作和汗水谋生。如果这意味着我们生产的比我们需要的更多，那就太好了。 +10% Agriculture, ranching, logging throughput	农民市场 如何将我们生产的产品分发给需要的人，现今似乎成了一个大问题。要是大环境允许，我们完全有能力亲自把产品送到所需的人手中。 +10% Infrastructure
实业家	避税 谁最清楚我们的钱应该花在哪里？不是政府，当然更不是现任政府。幸运的是，他们的无能留下了可以好好利用的征税漏洞。 −10% Manufacturing tax	进步的引擎 看看现代的奇迹吧！没有时间犹豫了。只要一个东西能被构思、设计并获得专利，它就应该被建造、测试并立即投入使用。 −10% Production technology cost	就业创造者 人首先得会花钱才能赚钱。只要政府能够承诺不干预我们的投资，我们就没道理不把利润投入经济增长。 +10% Capitalist investment pool contribution
知识分子	社会批评 当权者往往认为自己无可非议，但权威并不能让某人的想法变得有趣。我们有很多有趣的事情要说，并且我们确切地知道该对谁说。 −10%威望	先锋派 别人连想都不敢想的，我们就已经大声说出来了。我们的艺术和思想将直接切入人心，迫使人们睁开眼睛，如果不是惊讶，那就是惊愕！ −10% Society technology cost	宣传者 在我们的诗词、信件和政治宣言中，我们首先必须坚持把祖国取得的进步作为一个榜样，一个在这个新时代我们能够带给世界上不幸地区的榜样。 +25% State migration pull
工会	合法怠工 负责人似乎希望我们闭嘴，只照吩咐去做，毫无自主思想。让我们看看，如果我们真的把这种哲学贯彻到我们“无需技能”的劳动中，他们会怎么看。 −15% Construction Efficiency	产业骨干 不管是谁来负责，是工人们的合作方式最终对工厂的运作状况产生了更大的影响，而不是高层制定的任何规则。 +10% Manufacturing throughput	团结 所有想要工作的人都应该有工作！任何人都不应被排除在外。我们必须相互支持，保障每个人的权利，才能获得和付出劳动对等的报酬。 +10% Workforce ratio

部分国家拥有特殊特质

利益集团	特质	条件
	工作伦理 记住，金钱具有增值的性质。钱生钱，利润的产生是一种创造行为，是对上帝工作的尊重和赞美。 +5% 公司吞吐量增益	国教是新教 替换多子多孙
	苦行主义 远离世界上的玩乐是正确的道路。不要让自己被物质的变化所困扰；一切都是过眼云烟。 -50%生活水平降低带来的激进派	国教是印度教、大乘佛教或上座部佛教 替换多子多孙
	志愿劳动	国教是锡克教 替换多子多孙
	世俗授权	国教是格鲁派 替换多子多孙
	最好的复仇	国教是犹太教 替换全套特质
	叶史瓦
	意第绪传统
	天皇氏	国教是神道教 替换全套特质
	世俗神社理论
	废佛毁释
	达瓦	国教是逊尼派或什叶派 替换多子多孙
	沙里亚法	国教是逊尼派或什叶派，不是（无法识别“土耳其”，请查阅Template:国旗新） 替换君权神授
	奥斯曼民事法典	是（无法识别“奥斯曼帝国”，请查阅Template:国旗新） 替换君权神授
	本地上任	是 大清 替换全套特质
	新生军队
	自强
	生命冲力	是 法兰西，或有法兰西主流文化 替换爱国热情
	好老大	主流文化属西语圈、欧洲传承，不属伊比利亚
	长官统治	启用DLC rp1_content，是 巴西 替换File:IG trait materiel waste.png.png物资浪费与老兵咨询
	军人俱乐部

执政和在野

Interest groups which are not  marginalized are either  in government or  in opposition.

An interest group in government contributes its clout to the success chance of passing the laws they support, and to the stall chance of the laws they oppose. Proposing law changes usually requires an interest group in government which supports that law as well. Interest groups in opposition don't contribute their clout directly; however, unless they are happy or loyal, they may start a movement opposing a law change or demanding that a law be passed. By adding their clout to movement support, they can still affect the chance of success or stall.

合法性 

主条目：合法性

Legitimacy represents how well a government can function based on popular support for the ruling interest groups and how well those groups can work together. Legitimacy is strongly affected by Governance Principles and Distribution of Power laws. Legitimacy is increased by including high clout interest groups and high vote parties in government and decreased by having too many interest groups or parties, or groups which are too ideologically opposed in government. More autocratic forms of government also gain legitimacy by including the ruler's preferred interest group in government.

改革政府

Government can be reformed at any time by adding or removing interest groups. Any group in opposition can be added freely, but removing a group in government radicalizes 25% of its members. In countries with voting, elections provide an opportunity to reform the government without angering interest groups' members – the first reform within six months of a finished election does not radicalize members of groups removed from government.

There is a quick reform option which presents the three highest legitimacy options available, but note that this does not include the current government nor does it take radicalization from removing interest groups into account.

政党 

主条目：政党

Countries with voting and elections also have political parties, alliances of interest groups with similar concerns. Parties count as a single group for the purposes of legitimacy, and so allow more interest groups to be added to the government without penalty. However, in order to add or remove a party from government, all of its member interest groups must be added or removed together. There is no penalty for leaving an interest group out when it wants to join a party, except that it is impossible to reform government while a party is "split" this way, without unifying the party in government or in opposition.

Parties gain additional strength from votes of the last election. Pops do not vote for interest groups directly but rather for political parties, therefore interest groups that do not join a party miss out on a large amount of potential political strength.

政党吸引力

Interest groups update their party affiliations at the beginning of each election campaign and join the party they have the highest attraction towards, discounting parties that do not meet the requirements to exist or that the interest group is otherwise prohibited from joining. All Interest Groups have a base attraction of −5 towards all political parties and must have a final attraction of at least +1 in order to join a party. If an interest group does not have positive attraction towards any valid party, then it does not join any party or participate in the current election.

Below is a partial list of each interest group's attraction factors towards political parties as well as which other interest groups share those same factors. These tables only take typical core ideologies into account; leader ideologies in particular can greatly affect an interest group's party attraction. See Political party for a full list of all possible attraction factors.

军队集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative, +4 Fascist	Petite Bourgeoisie
Is Powerful	+10 Military
Country has Peasant Levies	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist	Rural Folk
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Guaranteed Liberties	+2 Conservative	Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Law Enforcement and country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Petite Bourgeoisie, Landowners
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Military	Trade Unions
Country has Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Social Democrat

虔信者集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative	Landowners
Is Powerful	+10 Religious
Country has Public Schools	+2 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Total Separation	+5 Conservative
Country has Freedom of Conscience	+3 Conservative
Country has Women's Suffrage	+3 Conservative, +3 Religious	Landowners
Country has Women in the Workplace	+2 Conservative	Landowners
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech	+3 Conservative	Landowners
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Theocracy	+5 Religious

实业家集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Free Trade
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Is Powerful	+10 Free Trade
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage	+5 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Graduated Taxation	+2 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Public Health Insurance	+2 Conservative
Country has Public Schools	+2 Conservative	Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Landowners
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Landowners
Country does not have Child Labor Allowed	+3 Free Trade
Country does not have Free Trade	+3 Free Trade
Country does not have Oligarchy or Wealth Voting	+3 Free Trade
Researched Currency Standards, country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Central Planning, country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Rural Folk
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Free Trade	Intelligentsia
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions

知识分子集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal, -15 Religious
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal	Industrialists
Country primary culture has Scandinavian Heritage	+10 Agrarian	Rural Folk
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Industrialists, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Debt Slavery	+10 Agrarian
Country has Outlawed Dissent	+3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has State Religion	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal
Country has Slave Trade or Legacy Slavaery	+5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +3 Radical
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has Autocracy	+3 Free Trade
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats	+3 Liberal	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Legal Guardianship	+3 Liberal	Trade Unions
Country has Ethnostate, National Supremacy or Racial Segregation	+3 Liberal
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+3 Liberal	Rural Folk
Country does not have Universal Suffrage	+10 Radical	Trade Unions
Country has National Guard or Secret Police	+6 Radical
Country has Legacy Slavery or Debt Slavery	+5 Social Democrat

地主集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative	Devout
Is not marginalized	-5 Religious
Clout ≥ 15%	+5 Conservative
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage	+5 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Universal Suffrage	+3 Fascist
Country has Graduated Taxation	+2 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Women's Suffrage	+3 Conservative, +3 Religious	Devout
Country has Women in the Workplace	+2 Conservative	Devout
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech	+3 Conservative	Devout
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Conservative	Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Industrialists
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Rural Folk
Researched Central Planning, Country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Rural Folk

小市民集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	−3 Communist, +5 Fascist
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative, +4 Fascist	Armed Forces
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Land-Based Taxation	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk
Country has Multiculturalism	+2 Conservative
Country has Guaranteed Liberties	+2 Conservative	Armed Forces
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces
Country does not have Proportional Taxation or Per-Capita Taxation	+3 Fascist, +3 Military
Researched Currency Standards, Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Landowners
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats	+3 Liberal	Intelligentsia

乡村民众集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Is powerful	+10 Agrarian
Country has primary culture with Scandinavian Heritage	+10 Agrarian	Intelligentsia
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Trade Unions, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has No Migration Controls	+5 Fascist
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+6 Agrarian, +3 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Country has Land-Based Taxation	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Social Democrat	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions, Landowners
Country has Lassiez-Faire	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has Peasant Levies	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Trade Unions, Intelligentsia, Industrialists
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Landowners
Country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Industrialists
Country has Debt Slavery	+5 Liberal
Country has Serfdom or Debt Slavery	+3 Radical

工会集团吸引力

Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to Trade Unions	+2 Communist, −2 Fascist
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk, Landowners
Country has Laissez-Faire	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has Outlawed Dissent	+3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia
Country does not have Graduated Taxation	+3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat	Industrialists
Country has Legal Guardianship	+3 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Military	Armed Forces
Country does not have Universal Suffrage	+10 Radical	Intelligentsia