讨论

利益集团：修订间差异

本页面所适用的版本可能已经过时，最后更新于1.1。
小 （文本替换 - 替换“{{green|”为“{{绿字|”）
小无编辑摘要
 
（未显示6个用户的34个中间版本）
第1行： 第1行：
{{Version|pre-release}}
{{ 版本|1.1}}
[[File:UI interest groups.png|thumb|An interest group with a short summary of: its leader, their ideologies and traits, and its political status.]]
[[ 文件:UI interest groups.png|thumb| 一个利益集团，简要介绍其领导人、意识形态和特征以及政治地位。|链接=Special:FilePath/UI_interest_groups.png]]


An interest group is a collection of pops that support certain political views and want to change the country to be more in line with those views. Interest groups are drawn from a number of different templates, but will vary in their exact views from country to country, based on factors such as the local religion, which social movements have appeared in the country or the personal views of their leader.
利益集团是一群支持某些观点并想要使国家向这个方向改革的人的集合，所有人或从属于某个利益集团或处于 {{图标|politically inactive}} 政治冷漠，而具体的利益集团倾向取决于多重因素，例如资质、{{图标|money|21px}}财富和{{图标|literacy}}识字率等。不同人所属的利益集团取决于不同的标准，利益集团的具体观点也会随着当地宗教、社会运动和领导人的修正在不同国家间变化。值得一提的是，人群的不同个体可能支持任何一个利益集团，使得该群体支持所有的利益集团（尽管在支持人数上有差异）
__TOC__
== 基础利益集团 ==
利益集团系统是维多利亚三的核心玩法之一。游戏中共有八种利益集团，以及一个额外的政治冷漠：
{{分栏|
* {{概念|地主}}
* {{概念|虔信者}}
* {{概念|军队}}
* {{概念|小市民}}
* {{概念|实业家}}
* {{概念|乡村民众}}
* {{概念|知识分子}}
* {{概念|工会}}
* {{概念|政治冷漠}}
|3}}


All individuals in all pops are either members of an interest group or {{icon|politically inactive}} politically inactive, with the ratio in each based on factors such as profession, {{icon|money|21px}} wealth, {{icon|literacy}} literacy, etc. It's important to note that a single pop can potentially have individual members supporting every interest group in the game (albeit in different numbers).
一国内利益集团的名字会随着各自的情况变化，如暹罗的{{ 概念| 虔信者}} 被称作小乘佛教僧侣，日本的{{ 概念| 军队}}被称作{{ruby| 武士|Samurai}} ，俄罗斯的 {{ 概念|地主}} 则被称为{{ruby|缙绅会议|Gentry Assembly}} 。


== Interest group categories ==
== 意识形态 ==
Interest groups form the nucleus of Victoria 3's political gameplay. There are 8 (+1 extra) interest groups in the game. These will be listed with their typical Ideologies and Traits below:
{{主条目|意识形态}}
利益集团包含一系列的意识形态，这些意识形态决定了他们所支持和反对施行的法律——利益集团通常偏爱那些契合他们信念和使他们受益的法律。


{| class="wikitable sortable"
不同的利益集团有不同的意识形态（例如{{概念|地主}}明显比{{概念|工会}}更加保守），但是这些并不是被定死的。利益集团的意识形态也会随着游戏的进程和领导人个人的偏好与意识形态而变化。
! Interest Group || Ideology || Approval of || activated Trait
 
此外，一些利益集团在特定国家内会有独特的意识形态，例如支持儒家思想的{{国旗新|大清}}儒生利益集团。
 
利益集团的默认意识形态设置如下:
{{#lst:利益集团|IG_ideology}}
''注:'' 利益集团的意识形态可能因国家或法律而异。例如, 如果该国允许奴隶制，{{概念|地主}}将获得{{概念|蓄奴主义者}}意识形态。
 
=== 领袖意识形态 ===
每个利益集团都被一个政治家领导，他们的个人主张影响着这个利益集团的立场和观点。这有时会使一个利益集团支持与其基础观点不同甚至完全相反的意识形态。
 
== 政治力量 ==
人群中的个体会为他们所支持的利益集团或政治运动贡献政治力量，一个个体贡献的政治力量受到多个因素的影响而修正，其中的主要因素包括人群的财富和本国权利结构所赋予的政治地位（或投票权）。例如，在寡头制国家内，一个富裕的{{概念|贵族}} 的政治力量是一个贫穷的{{概念|劳工}} 的成百上千倍。
 
有些人群没有任何政治力量，这通常由于本国法律剥夺了他们的政治权力（例如人群的文化或宗教受到歧视，或妇女没有投票权）。他们“被排除于权利系统之外”，无法通过加入利益集团等正常方式要求改革，不得不依靠[[政治运动]]向政府施压。
 
=== 吸引力 ===
利益集团对人群存在一个吸引力权重，处于某个利益集团的人群可以为其提供政治力量。利益集团对人群的吸引取决于该人群的宗教、文化、是否受歧视、识字率、失业情况和职业，因此有的人不会进入特定的利益集团。利益集团对人群的吸引情况如下表：
 
{| class="wikitable plainlist sortable mw-collapsible"
|+
! style="width: 10%" |
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|军队}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |
{{概念|虔信者}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|实业家}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|知识分子}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|地主}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|小市民}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|乡村民众}}
! style="width: 11.25%" |{{概念|工会}}
|- class="sorttop"
! Requirements
| One of:<br>Pop is not discriminated<br>Pop's profession is Aristocrats, Officers, or Servicemen
| Pop follows the state's religion
| Country must be centralized
| Pop's {{icon|literacy}} [[Literacy|识字率]] is over 25%<br />Country must be centralized
|
| Pop has primary culture<br />Pop is employed in Manufacturing, Service, Urban Facilities, or Government
| Pop is employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations
| Pop is '''not''' employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations<br />Country must be centralized
|- class="sorttop"
! Base Weight
| style="text-align:right"|'''0'''
| style="text-align:right"|{{green|25}}
| style="text-align:right"|'''0'''
| style="text-align:right"|'''0'''
| style="text-align:right"|'''0'''
| style="text-align:right"|{{green|75}}
| style="text-align:right"|{{green|50}} <!-- although not a base weight value, the condition for this is identical to the pop requirements, so it always applies -->
| style="text-align:right"| {{green|50}} <!-- although not a base weight value, the condition for this is identical to the pop requirements, so it always applies -->
|- class="sorttop"
! Other Weight Effects
| {{green|+25}} if not discriminated
| {{red|−2}} per 10% {{icon|literacy}} Literacy over 50% except {{icon|clergymen}} Clergymen
|
| {{green|+10}} if {{icon|literacy}} Literacy ≥ 50%<br />{{green|+2}} per 10% {{icon|literacy}} Literacy over 50%
|
|
|
| Final weight multiplied by:
*{{red|x0.5}} if not [[文件:Invention_egalitarianism.png|28px]] [[Society_technology#Egalitarianism|Egalitarianism]]
*{{red|x0.5}} if not [[文件:Invention_labor_movement.png|28px]] [[Society_technology#Labor Movement|Labor Movement]]
|- class="sorttop"
!colspan=9 style="text-align:center"| '''[[Profession|职业]]'''
|-
!data-sort-value=academics| {{icon|Academics|32px}} 学者
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=aristocrats| {{icon|Aristocrats|32px}} 贵族
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|-
!data-sort-value=bureaucrats| {{icon|Bureaucrats|32px}} 官僚
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+100 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+100}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=capitalists| {{icon|Capitalists|32px}} 资本家
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|-
!data-sort-value=clergymen| {{icon|Clergymen|32px}} 教士
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+100 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+100}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=clerks| {{icon|Clerks|32px}}职员
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+100 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+100}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=engineers| {{icon|Engineers|32px}} 工程师
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=farmers| {{icon|Farmers|32px}}农民
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=laborers| {{icon|Laborers|32px}} 劳工
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|-
!data-sort-value=machinists| {{icon|Machinists|32px}} 技工
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+100 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+100}}
|-
!data-sort-value=officers| {{icon|Officers|32px}} 军官
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|-
!data-sort-value=peasants| {{icon|Peasants|32px}} 自给农
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=servicemen| {{icon|Servicemen|32px}} 军人
|data-sort-value=+100 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+100}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|-
!data-sort-value=shopkeepers| {{icon|Shopkeepers|32px}} 店主
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=+50 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+50}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=+200 style="text-align:right"| {{green|+200}}
|data-sort-value=0|
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|-
!data-sort-value=slaves| {{icon|Slaves|32px}} 奴隶
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|data-sort-value=-9999 style="text-align:right"| {{icon|no}}
|}
 
==== 扶植和打压====
除非国家已经颁布 {{iconify|Guaranteed Liberties|law|保障自由}}, it can {{iconify|''bolster''|IG}} or {{iconify|''suppress''|IG}} interest groups, increasing or decreasing that groups attraction by some amount, as determined by its [[Human rights laws#Free Speech|Free Speech law]].
 
=== 势力 ===
一个利益集团内所有人群的政治力量之为这个利益集团提供势力——这决定了利益集团在国内和政府中的''clout'' – the amount of political weight it can assert on the country and the government. 利益集团的势力等于集团内政治力量与全国政治力量的百分比。例如，如果全国人群的政治力量为100k而{{图标|Industrialists|21px}}实业家 的政治力量为30k，他们的势力即为30%。
 
Clout determines the interest group's classification within their country – whether they are considered ''powerful'', ''influential'', or ''marginalized''.
 
An interest group becomes marginalized if their clout drops below 4%, unless they are in government. They become influential again if it increases above 5%.
 
Similarly, a interest group becomes powerful if their clout rises above 20%, and influential again if it drops below 18%.
 
== 支持度 ==
{{see also|政治运动}}
{| class="mildtable" style="float:right;"
|+ Summary of Approval Sources
! Source !! Approval
|-
|-
| {{icon|Armed forces}} Armed forces
! colspan=2 | Law Stances
| [[File:Ideology_jingoist.png|24px]] Jingoist <br/> [[File:Ideology_loyalist.png|24px]] Loyalist <br/> [[File:Ideology_patriotic.png|24px]] Patriotic
| rowspan=8 | {{绿字|≥10}}<br/>{{绿字|≥5}}<br/>{{red|≤5}}
| [[File:IG_trait_patriotic_fervor.png|24px]] Patriotic Fervor <br/> [[File:IG_trait_veteran_consultation.png|24px]] Veteran Consultation <br/> [[File:IG_trait_materiel_waste.png|24px]] Materiel Waste
|-
|-
| {{icon|bourgeoisie}} Petite bourgeoisie
| Strongly Approves || {{green|+2}}
| [[File:ideology_reactionary.png|24px]] Reactionary <br/> [[File:ideology_meritocratic.png|24px]] Meritocratic <br/> [[File:Ideology_patriotic.png|24px]] Patriotic
| [[File:IG_trait_treasury_bonds.png|24px]] Treasury Bonds <br/> [[File:IG_trait_middle_managers.png|24px]] Middle Managers <br/> [[File:IG_trait_xenophobia.png|24px]] Xenophobia
|-
|-
| {{icon|Devout}} Devout
| Approves || {{green|+1}}
| [[File:ideology_pious.png|24px]] Pious <br/> [[File:ideology_moralist.png|24px]] Moralist <br/> [[File:ideology_patriarchal.png|24px]] Patriarchal
| [[File:IG_trait_be_fruitful_and_multiply.png|24px]] Be Fruitful and Multiply {{绿字|+2%}} Birthrate <br/>
[[File:IG_trait_divine_right.png|24px]] Divine Right {{ 绿字|+10%}} Authority <br/>
[[File:IG_trait_pious_fiction.png|24px]] Pious Fiction {{red|-10%}} Education access
|-
|-
| {{icon|Industrialists}} Industrialists
| Disapproves || {{red| −1}}
| [[File:ideology_plutocratic.png|24px]] Plutocratic <br/> [[File:ideology_laissez_faire.png|24px]] Laissez-Faire <br/> [[File:ideology_individualist.png|24px]] Individualist
| [[File:IG_trait_job_creators.png|24px]] Job Creators <br/> [[File:IG_trait_engines_of_progress.png|24px]] Engines of Progress <br/> [[File:IG_trait_tax_avoidance.png|24px]] Tax Avoidance
|-
|-
| {{icon|Intelligentsia}} Intelligentsia
| Strongly Disapproves || {{red| −2}}
| [[File:ideology_liberal.png|24px]] Liberal <br/> [[File:ideology_anti_clerical.png|24px]] Anti-Clerical <br/> [[File:ideology_republican.png|24px]] Republican <br/> [[File:ideology_abolitionist.png|24px]] Anti-Slavery
| [[File:IG_trait_propagandists.png|24px]] Propagandists <br/> [[File:IG_trait_avant_garde.png|24px]] Avant-garde <br/> [[File:IG_trait_social_criticism.png|24px]] Social Criticism
|-
|-
| {{icon|Landowners}} Landowners
! colspan=2 | Law Changes
| [[File:ideology_paternalistic.png|24px]] Paternalistic <br/> [[File:ideology_stratocratic.png|24px]] Stratocratic <br/> [[File:ideology_patriarchal.png|24px]] Patriarchal
| [[File:IG_trait_noblesse_oblige.png|24px]] Noblesse Oblige <br/> [[File:IG_trait_family_ties.png|24px]] Family Ties <br/> [[File:IG_trait_noble_privileges.png|24px]] Noble Privileges
|-
|-
| {{icon|Rural folk}} Rural folk
| One step || '''±5'''
| [[File:ideology_agrarian.png|24px]] Agrarian <br/> [[File:ideology_particularist.png|24px]] Particularist <br/> [[File:ideology_isolationist.png|24px]] Isolationist
| [[File:IG_trait_farmers_markets.png|24px]] Farmer's Markets <br/> [[File:IG_trait_honest_work.png|24px]] Honest Work <br/> [[File:IG_trait_old_ways.png|24px]] Old Ways
|-
|-
| {{icon|Trade unions}} Trade unions
| Two steps || '''±10'''
| [[File:ideology_proletarian.png|24px]] Proletarian <br/> [[File:ideology_egalitarian.png|24px]] Egalitarian <br/> [[File:ideology_populist.png|24px]] Populist <br/> [[File:ideology_abolitionist.png|24px]] Anti-Slavery
| [[File:IG_trait_solidarity.png|24px]] Solidarity <br/> [[File:IG_trait_industrial_organizers.png|24px]] Industrial Organizers <br/> [[File:IG_trait_work_to_rule.png|24px]] Work-to-rule
|-
|-
| {{icon|Politically inactive}} Politically inactive
| Three or more steps || '''±20'''
| 
|-
|
! colspan=2 | Pop political strength
|-
| Each ~6% loyalist || {{green|+1}}
|-
| Each ~6% radical || {{red|−1}}
|}
|}
''Note:'' Interest groups' ideologies may differ based on country or law. For example Landowners gain the [[File:Ideology_slaver.png|24px]] Pro-Slavery Ideology, if Slavery is allowed in the country.
Interest groups have a level of ''approval'', which has two main sources: stances on [[文件:Event_scales.png|24px|link=]] [[laws]], and pop [[文件: Political loyalist.png|24px|link=]] loyalists and [[文件: Political radical.png|24px|link=]] radicals. Other factors may affect approval as well, such as the player's choices in certain events. Total approval is capped between {{red|−20}} and {{green|+20}}.<!-- According to defines, have to double check in-game -->
 
Each interest group and its leader's [[Ideology|ideologies]] set its stance towards various laws from on a five-point scale, from [[文件: Political disapproval.png|24px]] Strongly Disapprove ({{red|−2}}) to [[文件: Political approval.png|24px]] Strongly Approve ({{green|+2}}). Approval from laws is the sum of all stances, capped at '''±5'''.
 
In addition to the stance on enacted laws, proposed and recent law changes have an increased effect on an interest group's approval. A change which moves one step along their stance scale adds '''±5''', two steps adds '''±10''', and three or more steps adds '''±20'''. This effect is added throughout the proposed change, and when a law is fully enacted, it remains and decays over five years. Cancelling the proposed law change immediately removes this effect. The effect of law changes on approval is not directly capped and can stack when changing several laws in a short time.
 
The percentage of pops supporting an interest group which are loyalists or radicals also affects approval, up to '''±15''' if all of the pops are loyalists or radicals. The actual approval effect is determined by the percentage of pop political strength, if more political strength comes from loyalist pops, it is positive; otherwise if more comes from radicals, it is negative. This scaled by the relative amount, for example if two-thirds (66%) is loyalist and one-third (33%) radicals, the approval effect is {{green|+5}} as the loyalists provide {{green|+10}} which is offset by the radicals' {{red|−5}}.
 
Government and military wages affect certain interest groups by '''±1''' for each step above or below normal wages. Government wages affect {{icon|intelligentsia}} Intelligentsia and {{icon|bourgeoisie}} Petite Bourgeoisie approval, and military wages affect {{icon|armed forces}} Armed Forces approval.
 
If a group is powerful and [[ 文件: Political in opposition.png|24px|link=]] in opposition, their approval drops by {{red|−1}}.
 
Finally, there are many events, especially surrounding law changes, that add temporary approval modifiers to various interest groups.
 
=== 效果 ===
If an interest group's approval is {{red|−10}} or less, they are {{red|Angry}}. They cannot be added to the government, but do not leave it if they're already in it. They also contribute their clout to the radicalization of any movement they support, possibly starting a [[revolution]].
 
From {{red|−9}} to {{red|−5}}, a group is {{red|Unhappy}}, activating their negative trait.
 
From {{red|−4}} to {{green|+4}}, a group is '''Neutral''', providing no special effect.
 
From {{green|+5}} to {{green|+9}}, a group is {{green|Happy}}, activating their first positive trait. They also stop backing any movements.
 
At {{green|+10}} or above, a group is {{green|Loyal}}, activating their second positive trait.


''Note:'' Interest groups' names may differ depending on the circumstances in the country. For example, the {{icon|Devout|21px}} devout interest group may have its name based on the country's dominant religion.
=== 特质 ===
Each group has three traits associated with it, one negative, and two positive. If group's approval is {{red|−5}} or less, their negative trait is active. Approval of at least {{green|+5}} activates their first positive trait, and {{green|+10}} or more activates both of their positive traits.


== Ideology ==
Traits of a powerful group are twice as powerful, while marginalized groups cannot activate their traits at all.
{{main|Ideology}}
Interest groups have a number of ideologies which determine their views on which laws the country should or should not enact -- interest groups will generally favor laws that align with their beliefs and benefit them in some way.


Different interest groups will have different ideologies (for example, the {{icon|landowners|21px}} landowners are significantly more conservative than the {{icon|trade unions|21px}} trade unions), but these are not entirely set in stone. Ideologies can change over the course of the game and will also vary based on the current leader of the interest group, who comes with their own personal ideology and view of the world. 
{| class="wikitable"
! width=100px | 利益集团
! width=350px | 愤怒特质（支持度{{红字|≤5}}）!! width=350px | 满意特质（支持度{{绿字|≥5}}）!! width=350px | 忠诚特质（支持度{{绿字|≥10}}）
 
|-<!--{{图标框|||image=}}-->
| {{概念|地主|40px}}
|{{图标框|贵族特权|那个贵族履行责任且不用被税吏纠缠的时代哪儿去了？是时候重回旧日荣光了。<br>{{红字|−10%}} '''Agriculture, ranching, plantations tax'''|image=IG_trait_noble_privileges.png|中}}
|{{图标框|亲族纽带|即使身处变革的年代，我们仍然明白一段美好婚姻的价值。人脉关系比他们跨过的国境线还古老，甚至比联盟和政府都存续更久。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Influence'''|image=IG_trait_family_ties.png|中}}
|{{ 图标框|贵族义务| 我们比普通人更优渥，这意味着我们有责任照顾他们。如果他们试图亲自张罗什么，那也是自取灭亡，注定要失败。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Aristocrat investment pool contribution'''|image=IG_trait_noblesse_oblige.png| 中}}
|-
|style="background-color:#77AAAA;text-align:center"|{{ 图标| 虔信者|72px}}
|{{图标框|虔信小说|如今的价值观如此被毒害，文学如此腐败，以至于教育本身对道德产生了侵蚀作用。比起教人们当前体制认为“正确”的东西，更好的方法是教他们什么应该是正确的。<br>{{红字|−10%}} '''State education access'''|image=IG_trait_pious_fiction.png|中}}
|{{图标框|君权神授|我们相信，我们的生活蕴含着内在的秩序；而社会对于这种秩序的映照，可以是更为良善的，也可以是更为堕落的。倘若统治者道德高尚、法令公平公正，我们的人民就必能知晓其中的道理。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Authority'''|image=IG_trait_divine_right.png|中}}
|{{图标框|多子多孙|禁欲主义对于少数献身于精神追求的人来说是好的，但对于普通人来说，最重要的价值观是建立家庭和照顾孩子。<br>{{绿字|+2.5%}} Birth rate'''|image=IG_trait_be_fruitful_and_multiply.png|中}}'''
|-
|style="background-color:#635646;text-align:center"|{{图标|军队|72px}}
|{{图标框|物资浪费|对国家的忠诚不等于对政府的忠诚。如果我们不能信任当权者，我们不妨按我们认为合适的方式使用给到我们的东西。<br>{{红字|+25%}} '''Military goods cost'''|image=IG_trait_materiel_waste.png|中}}
|{{图标框|老兵咨询|技术进步正在改变战争的面貌，但我们只有对其充分了解，才能运用其精妙。幸运的是，我们这里有第一手经验的人，对此应该有所见解。<br>{{绿字|−10%}} '''Military technology cost'''|image=IG_trait_veteran_consultation.png|中}}
|{{图标框|爱国热情|无论战略多么高明，武器多么先进，有些战斗只有靠努力和勇气才能打赢。那些真正相信自己国家所代表信念的士兵将不顾一切地勇敢战斗。<br>{{绿字|+15%}} '''Unit defense'''<br>{{绿字|+15%}} '''Unit offense'''|image=IG_trait_patriotic_fervor.png|中}}
|-
| {{概念|小市民|40px}}
|{{图标框|排外|我们都知道谁应该为我们国家的现状负责，人们只是害怕说出来。与此同时，他们还在背后嘲笑我们让他们逍遥法外。需要有人采取行动。<br>{{红字|−10%}} '''Influence'''<br>{{红字|+100%}} '''Radicals from discrimination'''|image=IG_trait_xenophobia.png|中}}
|{{图标框|中层管理者|我们不能让每个人都照本宣科，但至少可以把做过的事情都记在书本上。总有人需要记住在这里做事的正确方式。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Bureaucracy'''|image=IG_trait_middle_managers.png|中}}
|{{图标框|国债|只要政府可以被信任会偿还债务，把我们辛苦赚来的积蓄用于资助这个伟大的国家不仅是爱国的，还是一项很好的投资。<br>{{绿字|−10%}} '''Loan interest rate'''|image=IG_trait_treasury_bonds.png|中}}
|-
| {{概念|乡村民众|40px}}
|{{图标框|传统|这些管理国家的人似乎对未来应该是怎样有各种各样的想法。但既然是他们导致了现状，我们为什么还要相信他们呢？<br>{{红字|−10%}} '''Tech spread'''|image=IG_trait_old_ways.png|中}}
|{{图标框|诚实工作|我们靠诚实的工作和汗水谋生。如果这意味着我们生产的比我们需要的更多，那就太好了。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Agriculture, ranching, logging throughput'''|image=IG_trait_honest_work.png|中}}
|{{图标框|农民市场|如何将我们生产的产品分发给需要的人，现今似乎成了一个大问题。要是大环境允许，我们完全有能力亲自把产品送到所需的人手中。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Infrastructure'''|image=IG_trait_farmers_markets.png|中}}
|-
| {{概念|实业家|40px}}
|{{图标框|避税|谁最清楚我们的钱应该花在哪里？不是政府，当然更不是现任政府。幸运的是，他们的无能留下了可以好好利用的征税漏洞。<br>{{红字|−10%}} '''Manufacturing tax'''|image=IG_trait_tax_avoidance.png|中}}
|{{图标框|进步的引擎|看看现代的奇迹吧！没有时间犹豫了。只要一个东西能被构思、设计并获得专利，它就应该被建造、测试并立即投入使用。<br>{{绿字|−10%}} '''Production technology cost'''|image=IG_trait_engines_of_progress.png|中}}
|{{图标框|就业创造者|人首先得会花钱才能赚钱。只要政府能够承诺不干预我们的投资，我们就没道理不把利润投入经济增长。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Capitalist investment pool contribution'''|image=IG_trait_job_creators.png|中}}
|-
| {{概念|知识分子|40px}}
|{{图标框|社会批评|当权者往往认为自己无可非议，但权威并不能让某人的想法变得有趣。我们有很多有趣的事情要说，并且我们确切地知道该对谁说。<br>{{红字|−10%}}'''威望'''|image=IG_trait_social_criticism.png|中}}
|{{图标框|先锋派|别人连想都不敢想的，我们就已经大声说出来了。我们的艺术和思想将直接切入人心，迫使人们睁开眼睛，如果不是惊讶，那就是惊愕！<br>{{绿字|−10%}} '''Society technology cost'''|image=IG_trait_avant_garde.png|中}}
|{{图标框|宣传者|在我们的诗词、信件和政治宣言中，我们首先必须坚持把祖国取得的进步作为一个榜样，一个在这个新时代我们能够带给世界上不幸地区的榜样。<br>{{绿字|+25%}} '''State migration pull'''|image=IG_trait_propagandists.png|中}}
|-
| {{概念|工会|40px}}
|{{图标框|合法怠工|负责人似乎希望我们闭嘴，只照吩咐去做，毫无自主思想。让我们看看，如果我们真的把这种哲学贯彻到我们“无需技能”的劳动中，他们会怎么看。<br>{{红字|−15%}} '''Construction Efficiency'''|image=IG_trait_work_to_rule.png|中}}
|{{图标框|产业骨干|不管是谁来负责，是工人们的合作方式最终对工厂的运作状况产生了更大的影响，而不是高层制定的任何规则。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Manufacturing throughput'''|image=IG_trait_industrial_organizers.png|中}}
|{{图标框|团结|所有想要工作的人都应该有工作！任何人都不应被排除在外。我们必须相互支持，保障每个人的权利，才能获得和付出劳动对等的报酬。<br>{{绿字|+10%}} '''Workforce ratio'''|image=IG_trait_solidarity.png|中}}
|}
 
部分国家拥有特殊特质
{| class="wikitable"
! width=100px | 利益集团
! width=350px | 特质
! 条件
|-
|rowspan=13 style="background-color:#77AAAA;text-align:center"|{{图标|虔信者|72px}}
|{{图标框|工作伦理|记住，金钱具有增值的性质。钱生钱，利润的产生是一种创造行为，是对上帝工作的尊重和赞美。<br>{{绿字|+5%}} '''公司吞吐量增益 '''|image=IG_trait_job_creators.png|中}}
|国教是{{概念|新教}}<br>替换{{概念|多子多孙}}
|-
|{{图标框|苦行主义|远离世界上的玩乐是正确的道路。不要让自己被物质的变化所困扰；一切都是过眼云烟。<br> {{绿字|-50%}}'''生活水平降低带来的激进派'''|image=IG_trait_be_fruitful_and_multiply.png|中}}
|国教是{{概念|印度教}}、{{概念|大乘佛教}}或{{概念|上座部佛教}}<br>替换{{概念|多子多孙}}
|-
|志愿劳动
|国教是{{概念|锡克教}}<br>替换{{概念|多子多孙}}
|-
|世俗授权
|国教是{{概念|格鲁派}}<br>替换{{概念|多子多孙}}
|-
|最好的复仇
|rowspan=3|国教是{{概念|犹太教}}<br>替换全套特质
|-
|叶史瓦
|-
|意第绪传统
|-
|天皇氏
|rowspan=3|国教是{{概念|神道教}}<br>替换全套特质
|-
|世俗神社理论
|-
|废佛毁释
|-
|达瓦
|国教是{{概念|逊尼派}}或{{概念|什叶派}}<br>替换{{概念|多子多孙}}
|-
|沙里亚法
|国教是{{概念|逊尼派}}或{{概念|什叶派}}，不是{{国旗新|土耳其}}<br>替换{{概念|君权神授}}
|-
|奥斯曼民事法典
|是{{国旗新|奥斯曼帝国}}<br>替换{{概念|君权神授}}
|-
|rowspan=7 style="background-color:#635646;text-align:center"|{{图标|军队|72px}}
|本地上任
|rowspan=3|是{{国旗新|大清}}<br>替换全套特质
|-
|新生军队
|-
|自强
|-
|生命冲力
|是{{国旗新|法兰西}}，或有法兰西主流文化<br>替换{{概念|爱国热情}}
|-
|好老大
|主流文化属西语圈、欧洲传承，不属伊比利亚
|-
|长官统治
|rowspan=2|启用DLC rp1_content，是{{国旗新|巴西}}<br>替换{{概念|物资浪费}}与{{概念|老兵咨询}}
|-
|军人俱乐部


Additionally, some interest groups in certain countries have unique ideologies colored by their religion and culture, such as the Confucian Scholars interest group in {{flag|China|0}} Qing China who support a Confucian ideology.
|}


== Political strength ==
== 执政和在野 ==
Individuals inside pops contribute political strength to their interest group of choice, with the amount they contribute again dependent on multiple factors, the main ones being their material wealth and the status (and/or votes) they are offered under the nation's power structure. For example, a single wealthy {{icon|aristocrats|21px}} aristocrat in an oligarchy will provide hundreds or even thousands times the political strength of a poor {{icon|laborers|21px}} laborer.
Interest groups which are not {{iconify|marginalized|political|link=}} are either {{iconify|''in government''|political|link=}} or {{iconify|''in opposition''|political|link=}}.


Some pops have no political strength at all, usually due to being disenfranchised under the nation's laws (such as people of a religion or culture that is discriminated against, or women in countries that haven't instituted women's suffrage). These pops are "outside the system" so to speak, unable to demand reform through the regular political system of interest groups, and instead having to rely on other methods to put pressure on the government.
An interest group in government contributes its clout to the success chance of passing the laws they support, and to the stall chance of the laws they oppose. Proposing law changes usually requires an interest group in government which supports that law as well. Interest groups in opposition don't contribute their clout directly; however, unless they are happy or loyal, they may start a movement opposing a law change or demanding that a law be passed. By adding their clout to movement support, they can still affect the chance of success or stall.


=== Clout and classification ===
=== 合法性 ===
The total political strength of all pops in an interest group is what gives it its level of clout -- the amount of political weight it can assert on the country and the government. The interest group's clout value is the percentage of the political strength it holds out of all the political strength in the country. For example, if all pops in the country have 100k political strength and the {{icon|Industrialists|21px}} industrialists have 30k political strength, then they control 30% of the clout in the country. 
{{主条目|合法性}}
Legitimacy represents how well a government can function based on popular support for the ruling interest groups and how well those groups can work together. Legitimacy is strongly affected by [[Power structure laws#Governance Principles|Governance Principles]] and [[Power structure laws#Distribution of Power|Distribution of Power]] laws. Legitimacy is increased by including high clout interest groups and high vote parties in government and decreased by having too many interest groups or parties, or groups which are too ideologically opposed in government. More autocratic forms of government also gain legitimacy by including the ruler's preferred interest group in government.


Clout, in turn, will determine the interest group's classification within their country -- whether they are considered powerful, influential or marginalized.
=== 改革政府 ===
Government can be reformed at any time by adding or removing interest groups. Any group in opposition can be added freely, but removing a group in government radicalizes {{red|25%}} of its members. In countries with voting, elections provide an opportunity to reform the government without angering interest groups' members – the first reform within six months of a finished election does not radicalize members of groups removed from government.


== Approval level ==
There is a quick reform option which presents the three highest legitimacy options available, but note that this does not include the current government nor does it take radicalization from removing interest groups into account.
{{see also|Political movement}}
Interest groups have a level of approval, which is based on factors such as how much they approve of the country's laws, whether they are in government or in opposition, and how many of their individual members are loyalists or radicals. There are numerous other factors that can affect approval as well, such as the player's reaction to certain events or the decisions that they take.


It is possible for one (or several) angry interest groups to start a civil war, potentially bringing in foreign countries to support them.
=== 政党 ===
{{主条目|政党}}
Countries with voting and elections also have political parties, alliances of interest groups with similar concerns. Parties count as a single group for the purposes of legitimacy, and so allow more interest groups to be added to the government without penalty. However, in order to add or remove a party from government, all of its member interest groups must be added or removed together. There is no penalty for leaving an interest group out when it wants to join a party, except that it is impossible to reform government while a party is "split" this way, without unifying the party in government or in opposition.


== Traits ==
Parties gain additional strength from votes of the last election. Pops do not vote for interest groups directly but rather for political parties, therefore interest groups that do not join a party miss out on a large amount of potential political strength.
The classification and approval of an interest group determines which traits are active for an interest group at any given time, and how impactful they are.
There are different traits, positive and negative, with positive traits being activated when an interest group is happy and negative ones when they are unhappy.
If an interest group is powerful, the effects of any traits they have active are stronger, while an interest group that is marginalized cannot activate traits at all, as they are too weak to exert an effect on the whole country.


The following modifiers are the base effects. They are doubled when the Interest Group is Powerful (≥20% Clout).
==== 政党吸引力 ====
Interest groups update their party affiliations at the beginning of each election campaign and join the party they have the highest attraction towards, discounting parties that do not meet the requirements to exist or that the interest group is otherwise prohibited from joining. All Interest Groups have a base attraction of {{red|−5}} towards all political parties and must have a final attraction of at least {{green|+1}} in order to join a party. If an interest group does not have positive attraction towards any valid party, then it does not join any party or participate in the current election.


{| class='wikitable'
Below is a partial list of each interest group's attraction factors towards political parties as well as which other interest groups share those same factors. These tables only take typical core ideologies into account; leader ideologies in particular can greatly affect an interest group's party attraction. See [[Political party]] for a full list of all possible attraction factors.
|+
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!Interest Group
|+style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Armed forces}} 军队集团吸引力
!Negative Trait (Loyalty {{red| ≤5}})
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
!Moderate Trait (Loyalty {{ 绿字| ≥5}})
|-
!Loyal Trait (Loyalty {{ 绿字| ≥10}})
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Conservative, +4 Fascist || Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Is Powerful || +10 Military ||
|-
| Country has Peasant Levies || +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist || Rural Folk
|-
| Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation || +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Social Democrat ||
|-
| Country has Guaranteed Liberties || +2 Conservative || Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Researched Law Enforcement and country has No Police || +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military || Petite Bourgeoisie, Landowners
|-
| Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation || +3 Military || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Consumption-Based Taxation || +3 Social Democrat ||
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Devout}} 虔信者集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Is Powerful || +10 Religious ||
|-
| Country has Public Schools || +2 Conservative || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Total Separation || +5 Conservative ||
|-
| Country has Freedom of Conscience || +3 Conservative ||
|-
| Country has Women's Suffrage || +3 Conservative, +3 Religious || Landowners
|-
| Country has Women in the Workplace || +2 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech || +3 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy || +3 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Country has Theocracy || +5 Religious ||
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Industrialists}} 实业家集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Free Trade ||
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Liberal || Intelligentsia
|-
| Is Powerful || +10 Free Trade ||
|-
| Country has Serfdom || +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat || Intelligentsia, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Universal Suffrage || +5 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Country has Graduated Taxation || +2 Conservative || Landowners
|-
| Country has Public Health Insurance || +2 Conservative ||
|-
| Country has Public Schools || +2 Conservative || Devout
|-
| Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections || +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade || Landowners
|-
| Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension || +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade || Landowners
|-
| Country does not have Child Labor Allowed || +3 Free Trade ||
|-
| Country does not have Free Trade || +3 Free Trade ||
|-
| Country does not have Oligarchy or Wealth Voting || +3 Free Trade ||
|-
| Researched Currency Standards, country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country has Graduated Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Landowners, Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Researched Central Planning, country has Command Economy || +3 Free Trade || Landowners, Rural Folk
|-
| Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools || +3 Free Trade || Intelligentsia
|-
| Country has No Schools or Religious Schools || +3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat || Trade Unions
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Intelligentsia}} 知识分子集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Liberal, -15 Religious ||
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Liberal || Industrialists
|-
| Country primary culture has Scandinavian Heritage || +10 Agrarian || Rural Folk
|-
| Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force || +6 Agrarian || Rural Folk
|-
| Country has Serfdom || +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat || Industrialists, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Debt Slavery || +10 Agrarian ||
|-
| Country has Outlawed Dissent || +3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has State Religion || +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal ||
|-
| Country has Slave Trade or Legacy Slavaery || +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +3 Radical ||
|-
| Country has Monarchy or Theocracy || +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Autocracy || +3 Free Trade ||
|-
| Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools || +3 Free Trade || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats || +3 Liberal || Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country has Legal Guardianship || +3 Liberal || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Ethnostate, National Supremacy or Racial Segregation || +3 Liberal ||
|-
| Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force || +3 Liberal || Rural Folk
|-
| Country does not have Universal Suffrage || +10 Radical || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has National Guard or Secret Police || +6 Radical ||
|-
| Country has Legacy Slavery or Debt Slavery || +5 Social Democrat ||
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Landowners}} 地主集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Conservative || Devout
|-
| Is not marginalized || -5 Religious ||
|-
| Clout ≥ 15% || +5 Conservative ||
|-
| Country has Free Trade || +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Rural Folk, Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Universal Suffrage || +5 Conservative || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Universal Suffrage || +3 Fascist ||
|-
| Country has Graduated Taxation || +2 Conservative || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Graduated Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Industrialists, Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country has Women's Suffrage || +3 Conservative, +3 Religious || Devout
|-
| Country has Women in the Workplace || +2 Conservative || Devout
|-
| Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech || +3 Conservative || Devout
|-
| Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy || +3 Conservative || Devout
|-
| Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections || +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension || +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade || Industrialists
|-
| Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police || +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military || Armed Forces, Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Rural Folk
|-
| Researched Central Planning, Country has Command Economy || +3 Free Trade || Industrialists, Rural Folk
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Bourgeoisie}} 小市民集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Inherent to ideology || −3 Communist, +5 Fascist ||
|-
| Inherent to ideology || +5 Conservative, +4 Fascist || Armed Forces
|-
| Country has No Migration Controls || +6 Agrarian || Rural Folk, Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Land-Based Taxation || +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Rural Folk
|-
| Country has Multiculturalism || +2 Conservative ||
|-
| Country has Guaranteed Liberties || +2 Conservative || Armed Forces
|-
| Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police || +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military || Armed Forces
|-
| Country does not have Proportional Taxation or Per-Capita Taxation || +3 Fascist, +3 Military ||
|-
| Researched Currency Standards, Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Industrialists
|-
| Country has Graduated Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Industrialists, Landowners
|-
| Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats || +3 Liberal || Intelligentsia
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Rural Folk}} 乡村民众集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
| Is powerful || +10 Agrarian ||
|-
| Country has primary culture with Scandinavian Heritage || +10 Agrarian || Intelligentsia
|-
| Country has No Migration Controls || +6 Agrarian || Trade Unions, Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country has No Migration Controls || +5 Fascist ||
|-
| Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force || +6 Agrarian, +3 Liberal || Intelligentsia
|-
| Country has Land-Based Taxation || +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Social Democrat || Petite Bourgeoisie
|-
| Country has Free Trade || +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Trade Unions, Landowners
|-
| Country has Lassiez-Faire || +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Trade Unions
|-
| Country has Peasant Levies || +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Military || Armed Forces
|-
| Country has Serfdom || +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat || Trade Unions, Intelligentsia, Industrialists
|-
| Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation || +3 Free Trade || Landowners
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Armed forces}} Armed Forces
| Country has Command Economy || +3 Free Trade || Landowners, Industrialists
|[[File:IG_trait_materiel_waste.png|24px]] Material Waste
|[[File:IG_trait_veteran_consultation.png|24px]] Veteran Consultation
|[[File:IG_trait_patriotic_fervor.png|24px]] Patriotic Fervor
|-
|-
| +25% Military Goods Cost
| Country has Debt Slavery || +5 Liberal ||
| -10% Military Technology Cost
| +15% Unit Offense, +15% Unit Defense
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Devout}} Devout
| Country has Serfdom or Debt Slavery || +3 Radical ||
|[[File:IG_trait_pious_fiction.png|24px]] Pious Fiction
|}
|[[File:IG_trait_divine_right.png|24px]] Divine Right
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|[[File:IG_trait_be_fruitful_and_multiply.png|24px]] Be Fruitful and Multiply
|+ style="white-space: nowrap; text-align: left;" | {{icon|Trade Unions}} 工会集团吸引力
! Condition !! Attraction !! Shared With
|-
|-
| -10% State Education Access
| Inherent to Trade Unions || +2 Communist, −2 Fascist ||
| +10% Authority
| +2.5% Birth Rate
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Industrialists}} Industrialists
| Country has No Migration Controls || +6 Agrarian || Rural Folk, Petite Bourgeoisie
|[[File:IG_trait_tax_avoidance.png|24px]] Tax Avoidance
|[[File:IG_trait_engines_of_progress.png|24px]] Engines of Progress
|[[File:IG_trait_job_creators.png|24px]] Job Creators
|-
|-
| -10% Manufacturing Tax (?)
| Country has Free Trade || +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Rural Folk, Landowners
| -10% Production Technology Cost
| +10% Capitalist Investment Pool Contribution
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Intelligentsia}} Intelligentsia
| Country has Laissez-Faire || +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat || Rural Folk
|[[File:IG_trait_social_criticism.png|24px]] Social Criticism
|[[File:IG_trait_avant_garde.png|24px]] Avant-garde
|[[File:IG_trait_propagandists.png|24px]] Propagandists
|-
|-
| -10% Prestige
| Country has Serfdom || +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat || Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
| -10% Society Technology Cost
| +50% State Migration Pull
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Landowners}} Landowners
| Country has Outlawed Dissent || +3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat || Intelligentsia
|[[File:IG_trait_noble_privileges.png|24px]] Noble Privileges
|[[File:IG_trait_family_ties.png|24px]] Family Ties
|[[File:IG_trait_noblesse_oblige.png|24px]] Noblesse Oblige
|-
|-
| -10% Agriculture, Ranching, Plantations Tax (?)
| Country has Monarchy or Theocracy || +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat || Intelligentsia
| +10% Influence
| +10% Aristocrat Investment Pool Contribution
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Bourgeoisie}} Petite Bourgeoisie
| Country does not have Graduated Taxation || +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat ||
|[[File:IG_trait_xenophobia.png|24px]] Xenophobia
|[[File:IG_trait_middle_managers.png|24px]] Middle Managers
|[[File:IG_trait_treasury_bonds.png|24px]] Treasury Bonds
|-
|-
| +100% Radicals from Discrimination, -10% Influence
| Country has Serfdom || +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat || Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
| +10% Bureaucracy
| -10% Loan Interest Rate
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Rural folk}} Rural folk
| Country has No Schools or Religious Schools || +3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat || Industrialists
|[[File:IG_trait_old_ways.png|24px]] Old Ways
|[[File:IG_trait_honest_work.png|24px]] Honest Work
|[[File:IG_trait_farmers_markets.png|24px]] Farmer's Markets
|-
|-
| -10% Tech Spread
| Country has Legal Guardianship || +3 Liberal || Intelligentsia
| +10% Agriculture, Ranching, Logging Throughput
| +10% Infrastructure
|-
|-
!rowspan=2|{{icon|Trade unions}} Trade unions
| Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation || +3 Military || Armed Forces
|[[File:IG_trait_work_to_rule.png|24px]] Work-to-rule
|[[File:IG_trait_industrial_organizers.png|24px]] Industrial Organizers
|[[File:IG_trait_solidarity.png|24px]] Solidarity
|-
|-
| -15% Construction
| Country does not have Universal Suffrage || +10 Radical || Intelligentsia
| +10% Manufacturing Throughput
| +10% Workforce Ratio
|}
|}


2024年2月22日 (四) 12:20的最新版本

一个利益集团，简要介绍其领导人、意识形态和特征以及政治地位。

利益集团是一群支持某些观点并想要使国家向这个方向改革的人的集合，所有人或从属于某个利益集团或处于 IG politically inactive.png 政治冷漠，而具体的利益集团倾向取决于多重因素，例如资质、Hud money.png财富和Literacy.png识字率等。不同人所属的利益集团取决于不同的标准，利益集团的具体观点也会随着当地宗教、社会运动和领导人的修正在不同国家间变化。值得一提的是，人群的不同个体可能支持任何一个利益集团，使得该群体支持所有的利益集团（尽管在支持人数上有差异）

基础利益集团 

利益集团系统是维多利亚三的核心玩法之一。游戏中共有八种利益集团，以及一个额外的政治冷漠：

一国内利益集团的名字会随着各自的情况变化，如暹罗的IG devout.png虔信者 被称作小乘佛教僧侣，日本的IG armed forces.png军队被称作武士（Samurai），俄罗斯的 IG landowners.png地主 则被称为缙绅会议（Gentry Assembly）。

意识形态

主条目：意识形态

利益集团包含一系列的意识形态，这些意识形态决定了他们所支持和反对施行的法律——利益集团通常偏爱那些契合他们信念和使他们受益的法律。

不同的利益集团有不同的意识形态（例如IG landowners.png地主明显比IG trade unions.png工会更加保守），但是这些并不是被定死的。利益集团的意识形态也会随着游戏的进程和领导人个人的偏好与意识形态而变化。

此外，一些利益集团在特定国家内会有独特的意识形态，例如支持儒家思想的CHI absolute monarchy.png 大清儒生利益集团。

利益集团的默认意识形态设置如下:

注: 利益集团的意识形态可能因国家或法律而异。例如, 如果该国允许奴隶制，IG landowners.png地主将获得（无法识别“蓄奴主义者”，请查阅Template:概念）意识形态。

领袖意识形态

每个利益集团都被一个政治家领导，他们的个人主张影响着这个利益集团的立场和观点。这有时会使一个利益集团支持与其基础观点不同甚至完全相反的意识形态。

政治力量

人群中的个体会为他们所支持的利益集团或政治运动贡献政治力量，一个个体贡献的政治力量受到多个因素的影响而修正，其中的主要因素包括人群的财富和本国权利结构所赋予的政治地位（或投票权）。例如，在寡头制国家内，一个富裕的Pop aristocrats.png 贵族 的政治力量是一个贫穷的Pop labours.png 劳工 的成百上千倍。

有些人群没有任何政治力量，这通常由于本国法律剥夺了他们的政治权力（例如人群的文化或宗教受到歧视，或妇女没有投票权）。他们“被排除于权利系统之外”，无法通过加入利益集团等正常方式要求改革，不得不依靠政治运动向政府施压。

吸引力

利益集团对人群存在一个吸引力权重，处于某个利益集团的人群可以为其提供政治力量。利益集团对人群的吸引取决于该人群的宗教、文化、是否受歧视、识字率、失业情况和职业，因此有的人不会进入特定的利益集团。利益集团对人群的吸引情况如下表：

IG armed forces.png军队 
IG devout.png虔信者
IG industrialists.png实业家 IG intelligensia.png知识分子 IG landowners.png地主 IG petty bourgeoisie.png小市民 IG rural folk.png乡村民众 IG trade unions.png工会
Requirements One of:
Pop is not discriminated
Pop's profession is Aristocrats, Officers, or Servicemen 		Pop follows the state's religion Country must be centralized Pop's Literacy.png 识字率 is over 25%
Country must be centralized 		Pop has primary culture
Pop is employed in Manufacturing, Service, Urban Facilities, or Government 		Pop is employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations Pop is not employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations
Country must be centralized
Base Weight 0 25 0 0 0 75 50 50
Other Weight Effects +25 if not discriminated −2 per 10% Literacy.png Literacy over 50% except Pop clergymen.png Clergymen +10 if Literacy.png Literacy ≥ 50%
+2 per 10% Literacy.png Literacy over 50% 		Final weight multiplied by:
职业
Pop academics.png 学者 No +200 No
Pop aristocrats.png 贵族 +50 +50 No +50 +200 No No No
Pop bureaucrats.png 官僚 No +100 No
Pop capitalists.png 资本家 +200 +50 No No No No
Pop clergymen.png 教士 +200 No +50 +100
Pop clerks.png职员 No +100 No +50
Pop engineers.png 工程师 +50 No
Pop farmers.png农民 No +50 +200
Pop laborers.png 劳工 No No +50
Pop machinists.png 技工 No No +100
Pop officers.png 军官 +200 No +50 No
Pop peasants.png 自给农 +50 No No No +200
Pop soldiers.png 军人 +100 No No
Pop shopkeepers.png 店主 +50 No +200 No
Pop slaves.png 奴隶 No No No No No No No No

扶植和打压

除非国家已经颁布 Law guaranteed liberties.png 保障自由, it can IG bolster.png bolster or IG suppress.png suppress interest groups, increasing or decreasing that groups attraction by some amount, as determined by its Free Speech law.

势力

一个利益集团内所有人群的政治力量之为这个利益集团提供势力——这决定了利益集团在国内和政府中的clout – the amount of political weight it can assert on the country and the government. 利益集团的势力等于集团内政治力量与全国政治力量的百分比。例如，如果全国人群的政治力量为100k而IG industrialists.png实业家 的政治力量为30k，他们的势力即为30%。

Clout determines the interest group's classification within their country – whether they are considered powerful, influential, or marginalized.

An interest group becomes marginalized if their clout drops below 4%, unless they are in government. They become influential again if it increases above 5%.

Similarly, a interest group becomes powerful if their clout rises above 20%, and influential again if it drops below 18%.

支持度

参见：政治运动
Summary of Approval Sources
Source Approval
Law Stances
Strongly Approves +2
Approves +1
Disapproves −1
Strongly Disapproves −2
Law Changes
One step ±5
Two steps ±10
Three or more steps ±20
Pop political strength
Each ~6% loyalist +1
Each ~6% radical −1

Interest groups have a level of approval, which has two main sources: stances on Event scales.png laws, and pop Political loyalist.png loyalists and Political radical.png radicals. Other factors may affect approval as well, such as the player's choices in certain events. Total approval is capped between −20 and +20.

Each interest group and its leader's ideologies set its stance towards various laws from on a five-point scale, from Political disapproval.png Strongly Disapprove (−2) to Political approval.png Strongly Approve (+2). Approval from laws is the sum of all stances, capped at ±5.

In addition to the stance on enacted laws, proposed and recent law changes have an increased effect on an interest group's approval. A change which moves one step along their stance scale adds ±5, two steps adds ±10, and three or more steps adds ±20. This effect is added throughout the proposed change, and when a law is fully enacted, it remains and decays over five years. Cancelling the proposed law change immediately removes this effect. The effect of law changes on approval is not directly capped and can stack when changing several laws in a short time.

The percentage of pops supporting an interest group which are loyalists or radicals also affects approval, up to ±15 if all of the pops are loyalists or radicals. The actual approval effect is determined by the percentage of pop political strength, if more political strength comes from loyalist pops, it is positive; otherwise if more comes from radicals, it is negative. This scaled by the relative amount, for example if two-thirds (66%) is loyalist and one-third (33%) radicals, the approval effect is +5 as the loyalists provide +10 which is offset by the radicals' −5.

Government and military wages affect certain interest groups by ±1 for each step above or below normal wages. Government wages affect IG intelligensia.png Intelligentsia and IG petty bourgeoisie.png Petite Bourgeoisie approval, and military wages affect IG armed forces.png Armed Forces approval.

If a group is powerful and Political in opposition.png in opposition, their approval drops by −1.

Finally, there are many events, especially surrounding law changes, that add temporary approval modifiers to various interest groups.

效果

If an interest group's approval is −10 or less, they are Angry. They cannot be added to the government, but do not leave it if they're already in it. They also contribute their clout to the radicalization of any movement they support, possibly starting a revolution.

From −9 to −5, a group is Unhappy, activating their negative trait.

From −4 to +4, a group is Neutral, providing no special effect.

From +5 to +9, a group is Happy, activating their first positive trait. They also stop backing any movements.

At +10 or above, a group is Loyal, activating their second positive trait.

特质

Each group has three traits associated with it, one negative, and two positive. If group's approval is −5 or less, their negative trait is active. Approval of at least +5 activates their first positive trait, and +10 or more activates both of their positive traits.

Traits of a powerful group are twice as powerful, while marginalized groups cannot activate their traits at all.

利益集团 愤怒特质（支持度≤5） 满意特质（支持度≥5） 忠诚特质（支持度≥10）
IG landowners.png地主
贵族特权 icon
贵族特权
那个贵族履行责任且不用被税吏纠缠的时代哪儿去了？是时候重回旧日荣光了。
−10% Agriculture, ranching, plantations tax
亲族纽带 icon
亲族纽带
即使身处变革的年代，我们仍然明白一段美好婚姻的价值。人脉关系比他们跨过的国境线还古老，甚至比联盟和政府都存续更久。
+10% Influence
贵族义务 icon
贵族义务
我们比普通人更优渥，这意味着我们有责任照顾他们。如果他们试图亲自张罗什么，那也是自取灭亡，注定要失败。
+10% Aristocrat investment pool contribution
IG devout.png
虔信小说 icon
虔信小说
如今的价值观如此被毒害，文学如此腐败，以至于教育本身对道德产生了侵蚀作用。比起教人们当前体制认为“正确”的东西，更好的方法是教他们什么应该是正确的。
−10% State education access
君权神授 icon
君权神授
我们相信，我们的生活蕴含着内在的秩序；而社会对于这种秩序的映照，可以是更为良善的，也可以是更为堕落的。倘若统治者道德高尚、法令公平公正，我们的人民就必能知晓其中的道理。
+10% Authority
多子多孙 icon
多子多孙
禁欲主义对于少数献身于精神追求的人来说是好的，但对于普通人来说，最重要的价值观是建立家庭和照顾孩子。
+2.5% Birth rate
IG armed forces.png
物资浪费 icon
物资浪费
对国家的忠诚不等于对政府的忠诚。如果我们不能信任当权者，我们不妨按我们认为合适的方式使用给到我们的东西。
+25% Military goods cost
老兵咨询 icon
老兵咨询
技术进步正在改变战争的面貌，但我们只有对其充分了解，才能运用其精妙。幸运的是，我们这里有第一手经验的人，对此应该有所见解。
−10% Military technology cost
爱国热情 icon
爱国热情
无论战略多么高明，武器多么先进，有些战斗只有靠努力和勇气才能打赢。那些真正相信自己国家所代表信念的士兵将不顾一切地勇敢战斗。
+15% Unit defense
+15% Unit offense
IG petty bourgeoisie.png小市民
排外 icon
排外
我们都知道谁应该为我们国家的现状负责，人们只是害怕说出来。与此同时，他们还在背后嘲笑我们让他们逍遥法外。需要有人采取行动。
−10% Influence
+100% Radicals from discrimination
中层管理者 icon
中层管理者
我们不能让每个人都照本宣科，但至少可以把做过的事情都记在书本上。总有人需要记住在这里做事的正确方式。
+10% Bureaucracy
国债 icon
国债
只要政府可以被信任会偿还债务，把我们辛苦赚来的积蓄用于资助这个伟大的国家不仅是爱国的，还是一项很好的投资。
−10% Loan interest rate
IG rural folk.png乡村民众
传统 icon
传统
这些管理国家的人似乎对未来应该是怎样有各种各样的想法。但既然是他们导致了现状，我们为什么还要相信他们呢？
−10% Tech spread
诚实工作 icon
诚实工作
我们靠诚实的工作和汗水谋生。如果这意味着我们生产的比我们需要的更多，那就太好了。
+10% Agriculture, ranching, logging throughput
农民市场 icon
农民市场
如何将我们生产的产品分发给需要的人，现今似乎成了一个大问题。要是大环境允许，我们完全有能力亲自把产品送到所需的人手中。
+10% Infrastructure
IG industrialists.png实业家
避税 icon
避税
谁最清楚我们的钱应该花在哪里？不是政府，当然更不是现任政府。幸运的是，他们的无能留下了可以好好利用的征税漏洞。
−10% Manufacturing tax
进步的引擎 icon
进步的引擎
看看现代的奇迹吧！没有时间犹豫了。只要一个东西能被构思、设计并获得专利，它就应该被建造、测试并立即投入使用。
−10% Production technology cost
就业创造者 icon
就业创造者
人首先得会花钱才能赚钱。只要政府能够承诺不干预我们的投资，我们就没道理不把利润投入经济增长。
+10% Capitalist investment pool contribution
IG intelligensia.png知识分子
社会批评 icon
社会批评
当权者往往认为自己无可非议，但权威并不能让某人的想法变得有趣。我们有很多有趣的事情要说，并且我们确切地知道该对谁说。
−10%威望
先锋派 icon
先锋派
别人连想都不敢想的，我们就已经大声说出来了。我们的艺术和思想将直接切入人心，迫使人们睁开眼睛，如果不是惊讶，那就是惊愕！
−10% Society technology cost
宣传者 icon
宣传者
在我们的诗词、信件和政治宣言中，我们首先必须坚持把祖国取得的进步作为一个榜样，一个在这个新时代我们能够带给世界上不幸地区的榜样。
+25% State migration pull
IG trade unions.png工会
合法怠工 icon
合法怠工
负责人似乎希望我们闭嘴，只照吩咐去做，毫无自主思想。让我们看看，如果我们真的把这种哲学贯彻到我们“无需技能”的劳动中，他们会怎么看。
−15% Construction Efficiency
产业骨干 icon
产业骨干
不管是谁来负责，是工人们的合作方式最终对工厂的运作状况产生了更大的影响，而不是高层制定的任何规则。
+10% Manufacturing throughput
团结 icon
团结
所有想要工作的人都应该有工作！任何人都不应被排除在外。我们必须相互支持，保障每个人的权利，才能获得和付出劳动对等的报酬。
+10% Workforce ratio

部分国家拥有特殊特质

利益集团 特质 条件
IG devout.png
工作伦理 icon
工作伦理
记住，金钱具有增值的性质。钱生钱，利润的产生是一种创造行为，是对上帝工作的尊重和赞美。
+5% 公司吞吐量增益
国教是Religion protestant.png新教
替换IG trait be fruitful and multiply.png多子多孙
苦行主义 icon
苦行主义
远离世界上的玩乐是正确的道路。不要让自己被物质的变化所困扰；一切都是过眼云烟。
-50%生活水平降低带来的激进派
 国教是Religion hindu.png印度教、Religion mahayana.png大乘佛教或Religion theravada.png上座部佛教
替换IG trait be fruitful and multiply.png多子多孙
志愿劳动 国教是Religion sikh.png锡克教
替换IG trait be fruitful and multiply.png多子多孙
世俗授权 国教是Religion gelugpa.png格鲁派
替换IG trait be fruitful and multiply.png多子多孙
最好的复仇 国教是Religion jewish.png犹太教
替换全套特质
叶史瓦
意第绪传统
天皇氏 国教是Religion shinto.png神道教
替换全套特质
世俗神社理论
废佛毁释
达瓦 国教是Religion sunni.png逊尼派或Religion shiite.png什叶派
替换IG trait be fruitful and multiply.png多子多孙
沙里亚法 国教是Religion sunni.png逊尼派或Religion shiite.png什叶派，不是（无法识别“土耳其”，请查阅Template:国旗新）
替换IG trait divine right.png君权神授
奥斯曼民事法典 是（无法识别“奥斯曼帝国”，请查阅Template:国旗新）
替换IG trait divine right.png君权神授
IG armed forces.png 本地上任 是CHI absolute monarchy.png 大清
替换全套特质
新生军队
自强
生命冲力 是Flag FRA.png 法兰西，或有法兰西主流文化
替换IG trait patriotic fervor.png爱国热情
好老大 主流文化属西语圈、欧洲传承，不属伊比利亚
长官统治 启用DLC rp1_content，是Flag BRZ.png 巴西
替换File:IG trait materiel waste.png.png物资浪费与IG trait veteran consultation.png老兵咨询
军人俱乐部

执政和在野

Interest groups which are not Political marginalized.png marginalized are either Political in government.png in government or Political in opposition.png in opposition.

An interest group in government contributes its clout to the success chance of passing the laws they support, and to the stall chance of the laws they oppose. Proposing law changes usually requires an interest group in government which supports that law as well. Interest groups in opposition don't contribute their clout directly; however, unless they are happy or loyal, they may start a movement opposing a law change or demanding that a law be passed. By adding their clout to movement support, they can still affect the chance of success or stall.

合法性 

主条目：合法性

Legitimacy represents how well a government can function based on popular support for the ruling interest groups and how well those groups can work together. Legitimacy is strongly affected by Governance Principles and Distribution of Power laws. Legitimacy is increased by including high clout interest groups and high vote parties in government and decreased by having too many interest groups or parties, or groups which are too ideologically opposed in government. More autocratic forms of government also gain legitimacy by including the ruler's preferred interest group in government.

改革政府

Government can be reformed at any time by adding or removing interest groups. Any group in opposition can be added freely, but removing a group in government radicalizes 25% of its members. In countries with voting, elections provide an opportunity to reform the government without angering interest groups' members – the first reform within six months of a finished election does not radicalize members of groups removed from government.

There is a quick reform option which presents the three highest legitimacy options available, but note that this does not include the current government nor does it take radicalization from removing interest groups into account.

政党 

主条目：政党

Countries with voting and elections also have political parties, alliances of interest groups with similar concerns. Parties count as a single group for the purposes of legitimacy, and so allow more interest groups to be added to the government without penalty. However, in order to add or remove a party from government, all of its member interest groups must be added or removed together. There is no penalty for leaving an interest group out when it wants to join a party, except that it is impossible to reform government while a party is "split" this way, without unifying the party in government or in opposition.

Parties gain additional strength from votes of the last election. Pops do not vote for interest groups directly but rather for political parties, therefore interest groups that do not join a party miss out on a large amount of potential political strength.

政党吸引力

Interest groups update their party affiliations at the beginning of each election campaign and join the party they have the highest attraction towards, discounting parties that do not meet the requirements to exist or that the interest group is otherwise prohibited from joining. All Interest Groups have a base attraction of −5 towards all political parties and must have a final attraction of at least +1 in order to join a party. If an interest group does not have positive attraction towards any valid party, then it does not join any party or participate in the current election.

Below is a partial list of each interest group's attraction factors towards political parties as well as which other interest groups share those same factors. These tables only take typical core ideologies into account; leader ideologies in particular can greatly affect an interest group's party attraction. See Political party for a full list of all possible attraction factors.

IG armed forces.png 军队集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology +5 Conservative, +4 Fascist Petite Bourgeoisie
Is Powerful +10 Military
Country has Peasant Levies +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist Rural Folk
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Guaranteed Liberties +2 Conservative Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Law Enforcement and country has No Police +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military Petite Bourgeoisie, Landowners
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation +3 Military Trade Unions
Country has Consumption-Based Taxation +3 Social Democrat
IG devout.png 虔信者集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology +5 Conservative Landowners
Is Powerful +10 Religious
Country has Public Schools +2 Conservative Industrialists
Country has Total Separation +5 Conservative
Country has Freedom of Conscience +3 Conservative
Country has Women's Suffrage +3 Conservative, +3 Religious Landowners
Country has Women in the Workplace +2 Conservative Landowners
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech +3 Conservative Landowners
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy +3 Conservative Landowners
Country has Theocracy +5 Religious
IG industrialists.png 实业家集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology +5 Free Trade
Inherent to ideology +5 Liberal Intelligentsia
Is Powerful +10 Free Trade
Country has Serfdom +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat Intelligentsia, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage +5 Conservative Landowners
Country has Graduated Taxation +2 Conservative Landowners
Country has Public Health Insurance +2 Conservative
Country has Public Schools +2 Conservative Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade Landowners
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade Landowners
Country does not have Child Labor Allowed +3 Free Trade
Country does not have Free Trade +3 Free Trade
Country does not have Oligarchy or Wealth Voting +3 Free Trade
Researched Currency Standards, country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation +3 Free Trade Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Graduated Taxation +3 Free Trade Landowners, Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Central Planning, country has Command Economy +3 Free Trade Landowners, Rural Folk
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools +3 Free Trade Intelligentsia
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools +3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat Trade Unions
IG intelligensia.png 知识分子集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology +5 Liberal, -15 Religious
Inherent to ideology +5 Liberal Industrialists
Country primary culture has Scandinavian Heritage +10 Agrarian Rural Folk
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force +6 Agrarian Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat Industrialists, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Debt Slavery +10 Agrarian
Country has Outlawed Dissent +3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat Trade Unions
Country has State Religion +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal
Country has Slave Trade or Legacy Slavaery +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +3 Radical
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat Trade Unions
Country has Autocracy +3 Free Trade
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools +3 Free Trade Industrialists
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats +3 Liberal Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Legal Guardianship +3 Liberal Trade Unions
Country has Ethnostate, National Supremacy or Racial Segregation +3 Liberal
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force +3 Liberal Rural Folk
Country does not have Universal Suffrage +10 Radical Trade Unions
Country has National Guard or Secret Police +6 Radical
Country has Legacy Slavery or Debt Slavery +5 Social Democrat
IG landowners.png 地主集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology +5 Conservative Devout
Is not marginalized -5 Religious
Clout ≥ 15% +5 Conservative
Country has Free Trade +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage +5 Conservative Industrialists
Country has Universal Suffrage +3 Fascist
Country has Graduated Taxation +2 Conservative Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation +3 Free Trade Industrialists, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Women's Suffrage +3 Conservative, +3 Religious Devout
Country has Women in the Workplace +2 Conservative Devout
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech +3 Conservative Devout
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy +3 Conservative Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade Industrialists
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension +5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade Industrialists
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military Armed Forces, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation +3 Free Trade Rural Folk
Researched Central Planning, Country has Command Economy +3 Free Trade Industrialists, Rural Folk
IG petty bourgeoisie.png 小市民集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to ideology −3 Communist, +5 Fascist
Inherent to ideology +5 Conservative, +4 Fascist Armed Forces
Country has No Migration Controls +6 Agrarian Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Land-Based Taxation +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Rural Folk
Country has Multiculturalism +2 Conservative
Country has Guaranteed Liberties +2 Conservative Armed Forces
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police +3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military Armed Forces
Country does not have Proportional Taxation or Per-Capita Taxation +3 Fascist, +3 Military
Researched Currency Standards, Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation +3 Free Trade Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation +3 Free Trade Industrialists, Landowners
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats +3 Liberal Intelligentsia
IG rural folk.png 乡村民众集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Is powerful +10 Agrarian
Country has primary culture with Scandinavian Heritage +10 Agrarian Intelligentsia
Country has No Migration Controls +6 Agrarian Trade Unions, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has No Migration Controls +5 Fascist
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force +6 Agrarian, +3 Liberal Intelligentsia
Country has Land-Based Taxation +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Social Democrat Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Trade Unions, Landowners
Country has Lassiez-Faire +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Trade Unions
Country has Peasant Levies +6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Military Armed Forces
Country has Serfdom +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat Trade Unions, Intelligentsia, Industrialists
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation +3 Free Trade Landowners
Country has Command Economy +3 Free Trade Landowners, Industrialists
Country has Debt Slavery +5 Liberal
Country has Serfdom or Debt Slavery +3 Radical
IG trade unions.png 工会集团吸引力
Condition Attraction Shared With
Inherent to Trade Unions +2 Communist, −2 Fascist
Country has No Migration Controls +6 Agrarian Rural Folk, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Rural Folk, Landowners
Country has Laissez-Faire +6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has Outlawed Dissent +3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat Intelligentsia
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat Intelligentsia
Country does not have Graduated Taxation +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Serfdom +10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools +3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat Industrialists
Country has Legal Guardianship +3 Liberal Intelligentsia
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation +3 Military Armed Forces
Country does not have Universal Suffrage +10 Radical Intelligentsia

参见