|
|
| （未显示2个用户的5个中间版本） |
| 第1行： |
第1行： |
| {{Version|pre-release}} | | {{ 版本|pre-release}} |
| [[File:UI politics movement.png|thumb|A law reform in progress and a movement to preserve the current law.]] | | [[ 文件:UI politics movement.png|thumb| 正在进行的法律改革和维护现行法律的政治运动|链接=Special:FilePath/UI_politics_movement.png]] |
|
| |
|
| A ''political movement'' is a way for pops to make a direct demand of the government, either because they desire change or because they don't desire the change you are currently pushing through. This allows for politically disenfranchised pops to push for reform, even if they lack political strength or institutional recognition.
| | '' 政治运动'' 是一种让人群直接向政府提出要求的方式，这要么是因为他们希望改变，要么是他们不希望你目前正在推动的改变。这允许政治上被剥夺权利的人群推动改革，即使他们缺乏政治力量或制度认可（institutional recognition ）。 |
|
| |
|
| Political movements have a singular goal and will exist only so long as this goal remains unfulfilled.
| | 政治运动有一个特定的目标，只有在这个目标仍未实现的情况下才会存在。 |
|
| |
|
| == Political movement types == | | == 政治运动类型 == |
| A political movement is always aimed at one particular law, and can take three different forms:
| | 政治运动总是针对一条特定的法律，具有三种不同的形式： |
|
| |
|
| * ''Movement to preserve'' - This is a political movement that can form when there is sufficient opposition to the passing of a particular law. For example, if {{flag|Great Britain}} starts replacing the Monarchy with a republic, it's very likely that this will result in a movement to preserve the monarchy. | | * '' 维护'' - 当有足够的力量反对通过某一特定法律时，就会产生这种政治运动。例如，如果{{flag|Great Britain}} 尝试废除君主制，实行共和制，这很可能会导致一场维护君主制的运动。 |
|
| |
|
| * ''Movement to enact'' - This is a political movement that can form when there is a popular demand for the enactment of a particular law. For example, if you have a politically active and literate but very poor underclass of laborers, these laborers might form a movement to create a minimum wage. | | * '' 制定'' - 当人群普遍要求制定某一特定法律时，就会产生这种政治运动。例如，如果你有一个政治活跃，识字但同时非常贫穷的劳工群体，那么这些劳工可能会组织一场运动以通过最低工资法律。 |
|
| |
|
| * ''Movement to restore'' - This is a political movement that works exactly like a movement to enact, but aims specifically to bring back a law that was previously in effect in the country. The main difference between a movement to restore and a movement to enact is that the former will tend to get some extra support from being able to harken back to the 'golden era' of the past instead of having to champion new ideas. For example, a movement to restore the monarchy in a Britain that successfully transitioned into a republic. | | * 恢复 - 这种政治运动的运作方式与制定运动完全相同，但其目的是使一项以前在该国生效的法律重新生效。恢复或制定某种法律的政治运动的区别在于前者可以获得一些额外的支持，因为相比尝试新理念，人们总是更喜欢回到过去的“黄金年代”。例如，在成功过渡为共和国的英国恢复君主制的运动。 |
|
| |
|
| == Support score == | | == 支持度 == |
| The impact political movements have on the country while pushing their goals manifests as their support score. A political movement can have support from both interest groups (which represents a part of the political establishment backing the movement) and individual pops (which represents individuals championing the movement in the streets).
| | 政治运动在推动其目标方面对国家产生的影响表现为支持度。一场政治运动可以同时得到利益集团（代表政治建制中支持该运动的一部分）和人群（代表在街头支持运动的个人）的支持。 |
|
| |
|
| Interest groups will provide support for the movement based on their clout. Which interest groups will or will not back a political movement depends on whether they would approve of a change to the new law (in case of enact/restore) or disapprove of the current change in progress (in case of preserve). Interest groups that have high approval or which are part of the government will not support political movements, though government IGs may put pressure on the player in other ways if they're not pleased with their actions.
| | 利益集团根据其势力为政治运动提供支持。哪些利益群体将支持或不支持一场政治运动，取决于他们是否会支持新法律（在制定/ 恢复情况下），或者是否会反对改变现有法律（在维护的情况下）。有高支持度或是政府一部分的利益集团不会支持政治运动，但如果政府利益集团对该行为不满意，他们可能会以其他的方式向玩家施压。 |
|
| |
|
| Pops are more complex, as they can back a political movement either because it aligns with their interest group or because they have something to gain directly from it -- for example, a discriminated pop backing a movement that would give them more rights. The support provided directly by pops is based on raw numbers -- the percentage of the supporting pops out of the country's whole population. This means that a single discriminated {{icon|laborers|21px}} laborer backing a movement provides just as much support as a fully enfranchised {{icon|aristocrats|21px}} aristocrat when taking action outside their interest group.
| | 人群的选择更为复杂，他们可以支持一场政治运动，要么是因为该运动的目的符合他们的利益集团的需求，要么是因为他们可以直接从中获益——例如，受到歧视的人群会支持一场赋予他们更多权利的政治运动。人群提供的支持基于原始数据——支持人口占全国总人口的百分比。这意味着当在其利益集团之外采取行动时，支持一场运动的一个受到歧视的{{ 图标|laborers|21px}} 劳工所提供的支持与一个完全享有特权的{{ 图标|aristocrats|21px}} 贵族一样多。 |
|
| |
|
| In other words, while political strength still plays an important role in political movements in the form of interest groups throwing their clout behind movements championing laws they like, it is entirely possible for a political movement to form with no interest group backing at all. For example, even if nobody is willing to champion workers' rights in the halls of power, enough angry workers in the streets may just be enough to affect change anyway.
| | 换言之，虽然政治力量在政治运动中仍然发挥着重要的作用，以利益集团的形式使用其势力支持与他们喜欢的法律相关的运动，但也完全有可能在没有任何利益集团支持的情况下形成政治运动。例如，即使在政坛没有人愿意中维护工人的权利，街头愤怒的工人也可能足以影响法律变革。 |
|
| |
|
| The support score of a political movement has two direct effects on legislation:
| | 政治运动的支持度对立法有两个直接影响： |
| # It affects the chance of successfully passing a law (making it easier to pass the law the movement wants in the case of a movement to enact/restore, and more difficult to replace in the case of a movement to preserve). | | # 影响成功通过法律的几率（在制定/ 恢复法律的情况下，更容易通过运动想要的法律，而在维护法律的情况下，会使法律更难被取代）。 |
| # Having a movement to enact/restore also allows a country to attempt to pass the law the movement wants, even if said law has no backing among the interest groups in government. | | # 制定/ 恢复法律的运动也允许一个国家尝试通过该运动想要的法律，即使该法律没有任何利益集团的支持。 |
|
| |
|
| == Radicals and loyalists == | | == 激进派和效忠派 == |
| The radicalism of a political movement comes into play if the player doesn't intend to bow to the wishes of a movement in their country. It is by no means a sure thing that every peaceful movement will become radical, and movements may very well fizzle out without accomplishing their goal, but ignoring the wishes of a significant part of the population and/or political establishment does come with some associated risks.
| | 如果玩家不打算屈从于国内运动的意愿，那么政治运动的激进度将会发挥作用。并非每一场和平运动都会变得激进，运动很可能在没有实现目标的情况下失败，但忽视大部分人口和/ 或利益集团的意愿确实会带来一些相关风险。 |
|
| |
|
| Radicalism is based on the number of radical pops and clout of angry interest groups supporting the movement. A movement with low radicalism is one that is intent on getting its wishes heard through peaceful means, while a movement with high radicalism is willing to use more extreme methods, up to and including sparking a revolution.
| | 激进度基于支持这场运动的激进派的数量以及愤怒的利益集团的势力。低激进度的运动致力于通过和平方式表达自己的意愿，而高激进度的运动则愿意使用更极端的方法，甚至于引发革命。 |
|
| |
|
| Radicals and loyalists, just like with interest group membership, are not whole pops but rather ''individuals'' within pops. {{icon|radical}} Radicals are individuals who have become disillusioned with the government and political apparatus of the country and want to seek change through any means necessary, while {{icon|loyalist}} loyalists are "patriots" who are generally willing to put their political views and goals aside for the sake of the nation.
| | 激进派和效忠派，就像利益集团的成员一样，不是由人群组成，而是由人群中的个人组成。{{ 图标|radical}} 激进派是对政府和政权感到失望，并希望通过任何必要手段寻求变革的个人，而{{ 图标|loyalist}} 效忠派是“爱国者”，他们通常愿意为了国家而抛开自己的政治观点和目标。 |
|
| |
|
| There is a large variety of ways that pops can become radicals or loyalists, here's a few of the more common reasons listed below: {{plainlist|
| | 人群可以通过多种方式成为激进派或者效忠派，下面列举了一些常见的原因： |
| * {{icon|loyalist}} Pops that experience an increase in material living standards will become more loyal.
| |
| * {{icon|loyalist}} Pops from political movements that have their demands fulfilled become more loyal.
| |
| * {{icon|radical}} Pops that experience a decrease in material living standards will become more radical.
| |
| * {{icon|radical}} Pops from political movements whose demands are ignored may radicalize over time.
| |
| * {{icon|radical}} Pops whose standard of living is below the minimum they expect to have will radicalize over time, particularly if it's so low that they're actually starving.
| |
| * {{icon|radical}} Pops that are literate but discriminated against tend to radicalize over time.
| |
| }}
| |
| Radicals and loyalists generally function in directly opposite ways. For example, radicals are more likely to create and join political movements (as well as playing an important role in radicalizing said movements) while loyalists will never join political movements. Loyalists make the interest groups they are part of happier, while radicals make them less happy and so on. This means that one way to prevent political activism and curtail movements that oppose your agenda is to increase the standard of living of your pops.
| |
|
| |
|
| Pops will remain radical or loyalist until they either die or have a status change as a result of becoming more radical/loyal (for example, a loyalist pop might stop being loyalist if their material standard of living suddenly takes a nosedive), but they do, in fact, die. As generations die off and are replaced by new ones, less and less people will remember all the great things done for the country 30 years ago and will start wondering instead what has been done for them lately.
| | {{图标|loyalist}}经历物质生活水平提升的人群将会变得更加忠诚。 |
| | |
| | {{图标|loyalist}}所期望政治运动得到满足的人群将会变得更加忠诚。 |
| | |
| | {{图标|radical}}经历物质生活水平降低的人群将会变得更加激进。 |
| | |
| | {{图标|radical}}所期望政治运动被忽视的人群将会变得更加激进。 |
| | |
| | {{图标|radical}}生活水平低于最低预期的人群将会变得更加激进，特别是他们的生活水平低到发生饥荒时。 |
| | |
| | {{图标|radical}}识字却被歧视的人群将会变得更加激进。 |
| | |
| | 激进派和效忠派通常以完全相反的方式发挥作用。例如，激进派更有可能创建和加入政治运动（以及在激化上述运动中发挥重要作用），而效忠派则不会加入任何政治运动。效忠派会使他们所属的利益集团更满意，而激进派则会使他们更不满意。这意味着，防止政治激进和减少反对你议程的运动的一种方法是提高你的人群的生活水平。 |
| | |
| | 人群会保持激进或忠诚，直到他们死亡或者因为变得更加激进/ 忠诚而改变身份（例如，如果一个忠诚的人群的物质生活水平突然下降，他们可能不再忠诚），而事实上，他们确实会死。随着一代又一代人的校网，越来越少的人会记得30年前国家为他们所做的一切伟大的事情，转而开始思考最近国家为他们做了什么。 |
|
| |
|
| == References == | | == References == |
政治运动是一种让人群直接向政府提出要求的方式，这要么是因为他们希望改变，要么是他们不希望你目前正在推动的改变。这允许政治上被剥夺权利的人群推动改革，即使他们缺乏政治力量或制度认可（institutional recognition）。
政治运动有一个特定的目标，只有在这个目标仍未实现的情况下才会存在。
政治运动类型
政治运动总是针对一条特定的法律，具有三种不同的形式：
- 制定 - 当人群普遍要求制定某一特定法律时，就会产生这种政治运动。例如，如果你有一个政治活跃，识字但同时非常贫穷的劳工群体，那么这些劳工可能会组织一场运动以通过最低工资法律。
- 恢复 - 这种政治运动的运作方式与制定运动完全相同，但其目的是使一项以前在该国生效的法律重新生效。恢复或制定某种法律的政治运动的区别在于前者可以获得一些额外的支持，因为相比尝试新理念，人们总是更喜欢回到过去的“黄金年代”。例如，在成功过渡为共和国的英国恢复君主制的运动。
支持度
政治运动在推动其目标方面对国家产生的影响表现为支持度。一场政治运动可以同时得到利益集团（代表政治建制中支持该运动的一部分）和人群（代表在街头支持运动的个人）的支持。
利益集团根据其势力为政治运动提供支持。哪些利益群体将支持或不支持一场政治运动，取决于他们是否会支持新法律（在制定/恢复情况下），或者是否会反对改变现有法律（在维护的情况下）。有高支持度或是政府一部分的利益集团不会支持政治运动，但如果政府利益集团对该行为不满意，他们可能会以其他的方式向玩家施压。
人群的选择更为复杂，他们可以支持一场政治运动，要么是因为该运动的目的符合他们的利益集团的需求，要么是因为他们可以直接从中获益——例如，受到歧视的人群会支持一场赋予他们更多权利的政治运动。人群提供的支持基于原始数据——支持人口占全国总人口的百分比。这意味着当在其利益集团之外采取行动时，支持一场运动的一个受到歧视的
劳工所提供的支持与一个完全享有特权的
贵族一样多。
换言之，虽然政治力量在政治运动中仍然发挥着重要的作用，以利益集团的形式使用其势力支持与他们喜欢的法律相关的运动，但也完全有可能在没有任何利益集团支持的情况下形成政治运动。例如，即使在政坛没有人愿意中维护工人的权利，街头愤怒的工人也可能足以影响法律变革。
政治运动的支持度对立法有两个直接影响：
- 影响成功通过法律的几率（在制定/恢复法律的情况下，更容易通过运动想要的法律，而在维护法律的情况下，会使法律更难被取代）。
- 制定/恢复法律的运动也允许一个国家尝试通过该运动想要的法律，即使该法律没有任何利益集团的支持。
激进派和效忠派
如果玩家不打算屈从于国内运动的意愿，那么政治运动的激进度将会发挥作用。并非每一场和平运动都会变得激进，运动很可能在没有实现目标的情况下失败，但忽视大部分人口和/或利益集团的意愿确实会带来一些相关风险。
激进度基于支持这场运动的激进派的数量以及愤怒的利益集团的势力。低激进度的运动致力于通过和平方式表达自己的意愿，而高激进度的运动则愿意使用更极端的方法，甚至于引发革命。
激进派和效忠派，就像利益集团的成员一样，不是由人群组成，而是由人群中的个人组成。
激进派是对政府和政权感到失望，并希望通过任何必要手段寻求变革的个人，而
效忠派是“爱国者”，他们通常愿意为了国家而抛开自己的政治观点和目标。
人群可以通过多种方式成为激进派或者效忠派，下面列举了一些常见的原因：
经历物质生活水平提升的人群将会变得更加忠诚。
所期望政治运动得到满足的人群将会变得更加忠诚。
经历物质生活水平降低的人群将会变得更加激进。
所期望政治运动被忽视的人群将会变得更加激进。
生活水平低于最低预期的人群将会变得更加激进，特别是他们的生活水平低到发生饥荒时。
识字却被歧视的人群将会变得更加激进。
激进派和效忠派通常以完全相反的方式发挥作用。例如，激进派更有可能创建和加入政治运动（以及在激化上述运动中发挥重要作用），而效忠派则不会加入任何政治运动。效忠派会使他们所属的利益集团更满意，而激进派则会使他们更不满意。这意味着，防止政治激进和减少反对你议程的运动的一种方法是提高你的人群的生活水平。
人群会保持激进或忠诚，直到他们死亡或者因为变得更加激进/忠诚而改变身份（例如，如果一个忠诚的人群的物质生活水平突然下降，他们可能不再忠诚），而事实上，他们确实会死。随着一代又一代人的校网，越来越少的人会记得30年前国家为他们所做的一切伟大的事情，转而开始思考最近国家为他们做了什么。
References
