利益集團

一個利益集團，簡要介紹其領導人、意識形態和特徵以及政治地位。

利益集團是一群支持某些觀點並想要使國家向這個方向改革的人的集合，所有人或從屬於某個利益集團或處於政治冷漠，而具體的利益集團傾向取決於多重因素，例如資質、財富和識字率等。不同人所屬的利益集團取決於不同的標準，利益集團的具體觀點也會隨著當地宗教、社會運動和領導人的修正在不同國家間變化。值得一提的是，人群的不同個體可能支持任何一個利益集團，使得該群體支持所有的利益集團（儘管在支持人數上有差異）

基礎利益集團

利益集團系統是維多利亞三的核心玩法之一。遊戲中共有八種利益集團，以及一個額外的政治冷漠：

一國內利益集團的名字會隨著各自的情況變化，如暹羅的 虔信者 被稱作小乘佛教僧侶，日本的軍隊被稱作武士（Samurai），俄羅斯的地主則被稱為縉紳會議（Gentry Assembly）。

意識形態

主條目：意識形態

利益集團包含一系列的意識形態，這些意識形態決定了他們所支持和反對施行的法律——利益集團通常偏愛那些契合他們信念和使他們受益的法律。

不同的利益集團有不同的意識形態（例如地主明顯比工會更加保守），但是這些並不是被定死的。利益集團的意識形態也會隨著遊戲的進程和領導人個人的偏好與意識形態而變化。

此外，一些利益集團在特定國家內會有獨特的意識形態，例如支持儒家思想的大清儒生利益集團。

利益集團的默認意識形態設置如下:

注: 利益集團的意識形態可能因國家或法律而異。例如, 如果該國允許奴隸制，地主將獲得（無法識別「蓄奴主義者」，請查閱Template:概念）意識形態。

領袖意識形態

每個利益集團都被一個政治家領導，他們的個人主張影響著這個利益集團的立場和觀點。這有時會使一個利益集團支持與其基礎觀點不同甚至完全相反的意識形態。

政治力量

人群中的個體會為他們所支持的利益集團或政治運動貢獻政治力量，一個個體貢獻的政治力量受到多個因素的影響而修正，其中的主要因素包括人群的財富和本國權利結構所賦予的政治地位（或投票權）。例如，在寡頭制國家內，一個富裕的貴族的政治力量是一個貧窮的勞工的成百上千倍。

有些人群沒有任何政治力量，這通常由於本國法律剝奪了他們的政治權力（例如人群的文化或宗教受到歧視，或婦女沒有投票權）。他們「被排除於權利系統之外」，無法通過加入利益集團等正常方式要求改革，不得不依靠政治運動向政府施壓。

吸引力

利益集團對人群存在一個吸引力權重，處於某個利益集團的人群可以為其提供政治力量。利益集團對人群的吸引取決於該人群的宗教、文化、是否受歧視、識字率、失業情況和職業，因此有的人不會進入特定的利益集團。利益集團對人群的吸引情況如下表：


	軍隊	虔信者	實業家	知識分子	地主	小市民	鄉村民眾	工會
Requirements	One of: Pop is not discriminated Pop's profession is Aristocrats, Officers, or Servicemen	Pop follows the state's religion	Country must be centralized	Pop's 識字率 is over 25% Country must be centralized		Pop has primary culture Pop is employed in Manufacturing, Service, Urban Facilities, or Government	Pop is employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations	Pop is not employed in Agriculture, Ranching, or Plantations Country must be centralized
Base Weight	0	25	0	0	0	75	50	50
Other Weight Effects	+25 if not discriminated	−2 per 10% Literacy over 50% except Clergymen		+10 if Literacy ≥ 50% +2 per 10% Literacy over 50%				Final weight multiplied by: x0.5 if not Egalitarianism x0.5 if not Labor Movement
職業
學者				+200
貴族	+50	+50		+50	+200
官僚				+100
資本家			+200	+50
教士		+200			+50		+100
職員				+100		+50
工程師			+50
農民					+50		+200
勞工								+50
技工								+100
軍官	+200				+50
自給農		+50					+200
軍人	+100
店主			+50			+200
奴隸

扶植和打壓

除非國家已經頒布保障自由, it can bolster or suppress interest groups, increasing or decreasing that groups attraction by some amount, as determined by its Free Speech law.

勢力

一個利益集團內所有人群的政治力量之為這個利益集團提供勢力——這決定了利益集團在國內和政府中的clout – the amount of political weight it can assert on the country and the government. 利益集團的勢力等於集團內政治力量與全國政治力量的百分比。例如，如果全國人群的政治力量為100k而實業家的政治力量為30k，他們的勢力即為30%。

Clout determines the interest group's classification within their country – whether they are considered powerful, influential, or marginalized.

An interest group becomes marginalized if their clout drops below 4%, unless they are in government. They become influential again if it increases above 5%.

Similarly, a interest group becomes powerful if their clout rises above 20%, and influential again if it drops below 18%.

支持度

參見：政治運動

Summary of Approval Sources
Source	Approval
Law Stances
Strongly Approves	+2
Approves	+1
Disapproves	−1
Strongly Disapproves	−2
Law Changes
One step	±5
Two steps	±10
Three or more steps	±20
Pop political strength
Each ~6% loyalist	+1
Each ~6% radical	−1

Interest groups have a level of approval, which has two main sources: stances on laws, and pop loyalists and radicals. Other factors may affect approval as well, such as the player's choices in certain events. Total approval is capped between −20 and +20.

Each interest group and its leader's ideologies set its stance towards various laws from on a five-point scale, from Strongly Disapprove (−2) to Strongly Approve (+2). Approval from laws is the sum of all stances, capped at ±5.

In addition to the stance on enacted laws, proposed and recent law changes have an increased effect on an interest group's approval. A change which moves one step along their stance scale adds ±5, two steps adds ±10, and three or more steps adds ±20. This effect is added throughout the proposed change, and when a law is fully enacted, it remains and decays over five years. Cancelling the proposed law change immediately removes this effect. The effect of law changes on approval is not directly capped and can stack when changing several laws in a short time.

The percentage of pops supporting an interest group which are loyalists or radicals also affects approval, up to ±15 if all of the pops are loyalists or radicals. The actual approval effect is determined by the percentage of pop political strength, if more political strength comes from loyalist pops, it is positive; otherwise if more comes from radicals, it is negative. This scaled by the relative amount, for example if two-thirds (66%) is loyalist and one-third (33%) radicals, the approval effect is +5 as the loyalists provide +10 which is offset by the radicals' −5.

Government and military wages affect certain interest groups by ±1 for each step above or below normal wages. Government wages affect Intelligentsia and Petite Bourgeoisie approval, and military wages affect Armed Forces approval.

If a group is powerful and in opposition, their approval drops by −1.

Finally, there are many events, especially surrounding law changes, that add temporary approval modifiers to various interest groups.

效果

If an interest group's approval is −10 or less, they are Angry. They cannot be added to the government, but do not leave it if they're already in it. They also contribute their clout to the radicalization of any movement they support, possibly starting a revolution.

From −9 to −5, a group is Unhappy, activating their negative trait.

From −4 to +4, a group is Neutral, providing no special effect.

From +5 to +9, a group is Happy, activating their first positive trait. They also stop backing any movements.

At +10 or above, a group is Loyal, activating their second positive trait.

特質

Each group has three traits associated with it, one negative, and two positive. If group's approval is −5 or less, their negative trait is active. Approval of at least +5 activates their first positive trait, and +10 or more activates both of their positive traits.

Traits of a powerful group are twice as powerful, while marginalized groups cannot activate their traits at all.

利益集團	憤怒特質（支持度≤5）	滿意特質（支持度≥5）	忠誠特質（支持度≥10）
地主	貴族特權那個貴族履行責任且不用被稅吏糾纏的時代哪兒去了？是時候重回舊日榮光了。 −10% Agriculture, ranching, plantations tax	親族紐帶即使身處變革的年代，我們仍然明白一段美好婚姻的價值。人脈關係比他們跨過的國境線還古老，甚至比聯盟和政府都存續更久。 +10% Influence	貴族義務我們比普通人更優渥，這意味著我們有責任照顧他們。如果他們試圖親自張羅什麼，那也是自取滅亡，註定要失敗。 +10% Aristocrat investment pool contribution
	虔信小說如今的價值觀如此被毒害，文學如此腐敗，以至於教育本身對道德產生了侵蝕作用。比起教人們當前體制認為「正確」的東西，更好的方法是教他們什麼應該是正確的。 −10% State education access	君權神授我們相信，我們的生活蘊含著內在的秩序；而社會對於這種秩序的映照，可以是更為良善的，也可以是更為墮落的。倘若統治者道德高尚、法令公平公正，我們的人民就必能知曉其中的道理。 +10% Authority	多子多孫禁欲主義對於少數獻身於精神追求的人來說是好的，但對於普通人來說，最重要的價值觀是建立家庭和照顧孩子。 +2.5% Birth rate
	物資浪費對國家的忠誠不等於對政府的忠誠。如果我們不能信任當權者，我們不妨按我們認為合適的方式使用給到我們的東西。 +25% Military goods cost	老兵諮詢技術進步正在改變戰爭的面貌，但我們只有對其充分了解，才能運用其精妙。幸運的是，我們這裡有第一手經驗的人，對此應該有所見解。 −10% Military technology cost	愛國熱情無論戰略多麼高明，武器多麼先進，有些戰鬥只有靠努力和勇氣才能打贏。那些真正相信自己國家所代表信念的士兵將不顧一切地勇敢戰鬥。 +15% Unit defense +15% Unit offense
小市民	排外我們都知道誰應該為我們國家的現狀負責，人們只是害怕說出來。與此同時，他們還在背後嘲笑我們讓他們逍遙法外。需要有人採取行動。 −10% Influence +100% Radicals from discrimination	中層管理者我們不能讓每個人都照本宣科，但至少可以把做過的事情都記在書本上。總有人需要記住在這裡做事的正確方式。 +10% Bureaucracy	國債只要政府可以被信任會償還債務，把我們辛苦賺來的積蓄用於資助這個偉大的國家不僅是愛國的，還是一項很好的投資。 −10% Loan interest rate
鄉村民眾	傳統這些管理國家的人似乎對未來應該是怎樣有各種各樣的想法。但既然是他們導致了現狀，我們為什麼還要相信他們呢？ −10% Tech spread	誠實工作我們靠誠實的工作和汗水謀生。如果這意味著我們生產的比我們需要的更多，那就太好了。 +10% Agriculture, ranching, logging throughput	農民市場如何將我們生產的產品分發給需要的人，現今似乎成了一個大問題。要是大環境允許，我們完全有能力親自把產品送到所需的人手中。 +10% Infrastructure
實業家	避稅誰最清楚我們的錢應該花在哪裡？不是政府，當然更不是現任政府。幸運的是，他們的無能留下了可以好好利用的徵稅漏洞。 −10% Manufacturing tax	進步的引擎看看現代的奇蹟吧！沒有時間猶豫了。只要一個東西能被構思、設計並獲得專利，它就應該被建造、測試並立即投入使用。 −10% Production technology cost	就業創造者人首先得會花錢才能賺錢。只要政府能夠承諾不干預我們的投資，我們就沒道理不把利潤投入經濟增長。 +10% Capitalist investment pool contribution
知識分子	社會批評當權者往往認為自己無可非議，但權威並不能讓某人的想法變得有趣。我們有很多有趣的事情要說，並且我們確切地知道該對誰說。 −10%威望	先鋒派別人連想都不敢想的，我們就已經大聲說出來了。我們的藝術和思想將直接切入人心，迫使人們睜開眼睛，如果不是驚訝，那就是驚愕！ −10% Society technology cost	宣傳者在我們的詩詞、信件和政治宣言中，我們首先必須堅持把祖國取得的進步作為一個榜樣，一個在這個新時代我們能夠帶給世界上不幸地區的榜樣。 +25% State migration pull
工會	合法怠工負責人似乎希望我們閉嘴，只照吩咐去做，毫無自主思想。讓我們看看，如果我們真的把這種哲學貫徹到我們「無需技能」的勞動中，他們會怎麼看。 −15% Construction Efficiency	產業骨幹不管是誰來負責，是工人們的合作方式最終對工廠的運作狀況產生了更大的影響，而不是高層制定的任何規則。 +10% Manufacturing throughput	團結所有想要工作的人都應該有工作！任何人都不應被排除在外。我們必須相互支持，保障每個人的權利，才能獲得和付出勞動對等的報酬。 +10% Workforce ratio

部分國家擁有特殊特質

利益集團	特質	條件
	工作倫理記住，金錢具有增值的性質。錢生錢，利潤的產生是一種創造行為，是對上帝工作的尊重和讚美。 +5% 公司吞吐量增益	國教是新教替換多子多孫
	苦行主義遠離世界上的玩樂是正確的道路。不要讓自己被物質的變化所困擾；一切都是過眼雲煙。 -50%生活水平降低帶來的激進派	國教是印度教、大乘佛教或上座部佛教替換多子多孫
	志願勞動	國教是錫克教替換多子多孫
	世俗授權	國教是格魯派替換多子多孫
	最好的復仇	國教是猶太教替換全套特質
	葉史瓦
	意第緒傳統
	天皇氏	國教是神道教替換全套特質
	世俗神社理論
	廢佛毀釋
	達瓦	國教是遜尼派或什葉派替換多子多孫
	沙里亞法	國教是遜尼派或什葉派，不是（無法識別「土耳其」，請查閱Template:國旗新）替換君權神授
	奧斯曼民事法典	是（無法識別「奧斯曼帝國」，請查閱Template:國旗新）替換君權神授
	本地上任	是大清替換全套特質
	新生軍隊
	自強
	生命衝力	是法蘭西，或有法蘭西主流文化替換愛國熱情
	好老大	主流文化屬西語圈、歐洲傳承，不屬伊比利亞
	長官統治	啟用DLC rp1_content，是巴西替換File:IG trait materiel waste.png.png 物資浪費與老兵諮詢
	軍人俱樂部

執政和在野

Interest groups which are not marginalized are either in government or in opposition.

An interest group in government contributes its clout to the success chance of passing the laws they support, and to the stall chance of the laws they oppose. Proposing law changes usually requires an interest group in government which supports that law as well. Interest groups in opposition don't contribute their clout directly; however, unless they are happy or loyal, they may start a movement opposing a law change or demanding that a law be passed. By adding their clout to movement support, they can still affect the chance of success or stall.

合法性

主條目：合法性

Legitimacy represents how well a government can function based on popular support for the ruling interest groups and how well those groups can work together. Legitimacy is strongly affected by Governance Principles and Distribution of Power laws. Legitimacy is increased by including high clout interest groups and high vote parties in government and decreased by having too many interest groups or parties, or groups which are too ideologically opposed in government. More autocratic forms of government also gain legitimacy by including the ruler's preferred interest group in government.

改革政府

Government can be reformed at any time by adding or removing interest groups. Any group in opposition can be added freely, but removing a group in government radicalizes 25% of its members. In countries with voting, elections provide an opportunity to reform the government without angering interest groups' members – the first reform within six months of a finished election does not radicalize members of groups removed from government.

There is a quick reform option which presents the three highest legitimacy options available, but note that this does not include the current government nor does it take radicalization from removing interest groups into account.

政黨

主條目：政黨

Countries with voting and elections also have political parties, alliances of interest groups with similar concerns. Parties count as a single group for the purposes of legitimacy, and so allow more interest groups to be added to the government without penalty. However, in order to add or remove a party from government, all of its member interest groups must be added or removed together. There is no penalty for leaving an interest group out when it wants to join a party, except that it is impossible to reform government while a party is "split" this way, without unifying the party in government or in opposition.

Parties gain additional strength from votes of the last election. Pops do not vote for interest groups directly but rather for political parties, therefore interest groups that do not join a party miss out on a large amount of potential political strength.

政黨吸引力

Interest groups update their party affiliations at the beginning of each election campaign and join the party they have the highest attraction towards, discounting parties that do not meet the requirements to exist or that the interest group is otherwise prohibited from joining. All Interest Groups have a base attraction of −5 towards all political parties and must have a final attraction of at least +1 in order to join a party. If an interest group does not have positive attraction towards any valid party, then it does not join any party or participate in the current election.

Below is a partial list of each interest group's attraction factors towards political parties as well as which other interest groups share those same factors. These tables only take typical core ideologies into account; leader ideologies in particular can greatly affect an interest group's party attraction. See Political party for a full list of all possible attraction factors.

軍隊集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative, +4 Fascist	Petite Bourgeoisie
Is Powerful	+10 Military
Country has Peasant Levies	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist	Rural Folk
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Guaranteed Liberties	+2 Conservative	Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Law Enforcement and country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Petite Bourgeoisie, Landowners
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Military	Trade Unions
Country has Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Social Democrat

虔信者集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative	Landowners
Is Powerful	+10 Religious
Country has Public Schools	+2 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Total Separation	+5 Conservative
Country has Freedom of Conscience	+3 Conservative
Country has Women's Suffrage	+3 Conservative, +3 Religious	Landowners
Country has Women in the Workplace	+2 Conservative	Landowners
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech	+3 Conservative	Landowners
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Theocracy	+5 Religious

實業家集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Free Trade
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Is Powerful	+10 Free Trade
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage	+5 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Graduated Taxation	+2 Conservative	Landowners
Country has Public Health Insurance	+2 Conservative
Country has Public Schools	+2 Conservative	Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Landowners
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Landowners
Country does not have Child Labor Allowed	+3 Free Trade
Country does not have Free Trade	+3 Free Trade
Country does not have Oligarchy or Wealth Voting	+3 Free Trade
Researched Currency Standards, country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Petite Bourgeoisie
Researched Central Planning, country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Rural Folk
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Free Trade	Intelligentsia
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions

知識分子集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal, -15 Religious
Inherent to ideology	+5 Liberal	Industrialists
Country primary culture has Scandinavian Heritage	+10 Agrarian	Rural Folk
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Industrialists, Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Debt Slavery	+10 Agrarian
Country has Outlawed Dissent	+3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has State Religion	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal
Country has Slave Trade or Legacy Slavaery	+5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +3 Radical
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has Autocracy	+3 Free Trade
Researched Academia, country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats	+3 Liberal	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Legal Guardianship	+3 Liberal	Trade Unions
Country has Ethnostate, National Supremacy or Racial Segregation	+3 Liberal
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+3 Liberal	Rural Folk
Country does not have Universal Suffrage	+10 Radical	Trade Unions
Country has National Guard or Secret Police	+6 Radical
Country has Legacy Slavery or Debt Slavery	+5 Social Democrat

地主集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative	Devout
Is not marginalized	-5 Religious
Clout ≥ 15%	+5 Conservative
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Universal Suffrage	+5 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Universal Suffrage	+3 Fascist
Country has Graduated Taxation	+2 Conservative	Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Women's Suffrage	+3 Conservative, +3 Religious	Devout
Country has Women in the Workplace	+2 Conservative	Devout
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has Right of Assembly or Protected Speech	+3 Conservative	Devout
Country does not have Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Conservative	Devout
Country has Regulatory Bodies or Worker's Protections	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Wage Subsidies or Old Age Pension	+5 Conservative, +5 Free Trade	Industrialists
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Rural Folk
Researched Central Planning, Country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Rural Folk

小市民集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to ideology	−3 Communist, +5 Fascist
Inherent to ideology	+5 Conservative, +4 Fascist	Armed Forces
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk, Trade Unions
Country has Land-Based Taxation	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk
Country has Multiculturalism	+2 Conservative
Country has Guaranteed Liberties	+2 Conservative	Armed Forces
Researched Law Enforcement, Country has No Police	+3 Conservative, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces
Country does not have Proportional Taxation or Per-Capita Taxation	+3 Fascist, +3 Military
Researched Currency Standards, Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists
Country has Graduated Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Industrialists, Landowners
Country has Hereditary Bureaucrats	+3 Liberal	Intelligentsia

鄉村民眾集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Is powerful	+10 Agrarian
Country has primary culture with Scandinavian Heritage	+10 Agrarian	Intelligentsia
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Trade Unions, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has No Migration Controls	+5 Fascist
Country has Local Police Force or Militarized Police Force	+6 Agrarian, +3 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Country has Land-Based Taxation	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Social Democrat	Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions, Landowners
Country has Lassiez-Faire	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Trade Unions
Country has Peasant Levies	+6 Agrarian, +3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Fascist, +3 Military	Armed Forces
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Trade Unions, Intelligentsia, Industrialists
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation or Consumption-Based Taxation	+3 Free Trade	Landowners
Country has Command Economy	+3 Free Trade	Landowners, Industrialists
Country has Debt Slavery	+5 Liberal
Country has Serfdom or Debt Slavery	+3 Radical

工會集團吸引力
Condition	Attraction	Shared With
Inherent to Trade Unions	+2 Communist, −2 Fascist
Country has No Migration Controls	+6 Agrarian	Rural Folk, Petite Bourgeoisie
Country has Free Trade	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk, Landowners
Country has Laissez-Faire	+6 Agrarian, +3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat	Rural Folk
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has Outlawed Dissent	+3 Anarchist, +3 Liberal, +6 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia
Country has Monarchy or Theocracy	+3 Anarchist, +3 Communist, +3 Liberal, +10 Radical, +3 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia
Country does not have Graduated Taxation	+3 Communist, +3 Social Democrat
Country has Serfdom	+10 Agrarian, +5 Anarchist, +5 Communist, +5 Liberal, +3 Radical, +5 Social Democrat	Intelligentsia, Industrialists, Rural Folk
Country has No Schools or Religious Schools	+3 Liberal, +3 Social Democrat	Industrialists
Country has Legal Guardianship	+3 Liberal	Intelligentsia
Country does not have Per-Capita Taxation, Proportional Taxation or Graduated Taxation	+3 Military	Armed Forces
Country does not have Universal Suffrage	+10 Radical	Intelligentsia

參見

利益集團	憤怒特質（支持度≤5）	滿意特質（支持度≥5）	忠誠特質（支持度≥10）
地主	貴族特權那個貴族履行責任且不用被稅吏糾纏的時代哪兒去了？是時候重回舊日榮光了。 −10% Agriculture, ranching, plantations tax	親族紐帶即使身處變革的年代，我們仍然明白一段美好婚姻的價值。人脈關係比他們跨過的國境線還古老，甚至比聯盟和政府都存續更久。 +10% Influence	貴族義務我們比普通人更優渥，這意味著我們有責任照顧他們。如果他們試圖親自張羅什麼，那也是自取滅亡，註定要失敗。 +10% Aristocrat investment pool contribution
	虔信小說如今的價值觀如此被毒害，文學如此腐敗，以至於教育本身對道德產生了侵蝕作用。比起教人們當前體制認為「正確」的東西，更好的方法是教他們什麼應該是正確的。 −10% State education access	君權神授我們相信，我們的生活蘊含著內在的秩序；而社會對於這種秩序的映照，可以是更為良善的，也可以是更為墮落的。倘若統治者道德高尚、法令公平公正，我們的人民就必能知曉其中的道理。 +10% Authority	多子多孫禁欲主義對於少數獻身於精神追求的人來說是好的，但對於普通人來說，最重要的價值觀是建立家庭和照顧孩子。 +2.5% Birth rate
	物資浪費對國家的忠誠不等於對政府的忠誠。如果我們不能信任當權者，我們不妨按我們認為合適的方式使用給到我們的東西。 +25% Military goods cost	老兵諮詢技術進步正在改變戰爭的面貌，但我們只有對其充分了解，才能運用其精妙。幸運的是，我們這裡有第一手經驗的人，對此應該有所見解。 −10% Military technology cost	愛國熱情無論戰略多麼高明，武器多麼先進，有些戰鬥只有靠努力和勇氣才能打贏。那些真正相信自己國家所代表信念的士兵將不顧一切地勇敢戰鬥。 +15% Unit defense +15% Unit offense
小市民	排外我們都知道誰應該為我們國家的現狀負責，人們只是害怕說出來。與此同時，他們還在背後嘲笑我們讓他們逍遙法外。需要有人採取行動。 −10% Influence +100% Radicals from discrimination	中層管理者我們不能讓每個人都照本宣科，但至少可以把做過的事情都記在書本上。總有人需要記住在這裡做事的正確方式。 +10% Bureaucracy	國債只要政府可以被信任會償還債務，把我們辛苦賺來的積蓄用於資助這個偉大的國家不僅是愛國的，還是一項很好的投資。 −10% Loan interest rate
鄉村民眾	傳統這些管理國家的人似乎對未來應該是怎樣有各種各樣的想法。但既然是他們導致了現狀，我們為什麼還要相信他們呢？ −10% Tech spread	誠實工作我們靠誠實的工作和汗水謀生。如果這意味著我們生產的比我們需要的更多，那就太好了。 +10% Agriculture, ranching, logging throughput	農民市場如何將我們生產的產品分發給需要的人，現今似乎成了一個大問題。要是大環境允許，我們完全有能力親自把產品送到所需的人手中。 +10% Infrastructure
實業家	避稅誰最清楚我們的錢應該花在哪裡？不是政府，當然更不是現任政府。幸運的是，他們的無能留下了可以好好利用的徵稅漏洞。 −10% Manufacturing tax	進步的引擎看看現代的奇蹟吧！沒有時間猶豫了。只要一個東西能被構思、設計並獲得專利，它就應該被建造、測試並立即投入使用。 −10% Production technology cost	就業創造者人首先得會花錢才能賺錢。只要政府能夠承諾不干預我們的投資，我們就沒道理不把利潤投入經濟增長。 +10% Capitalist investment pool contribution
知識分子	社會批評當權者往往認為自己無可非議，但權威並不能讓某人的想法變得有趣。我們有很多有趣的事情要說，並且我們確切地知道該對誰說。 −10%威望	先鋒派別人連想都不敢想的，我們就已經大聲說出來了。我們的藝術和思想將直接切入人心，迫使人們睜開眼睛，如果不是驚訝，那就是驚愕！ −10% Society technology cost	宣傳者在我們的詩詞、信件和政治宣言中，我們首先必須堅持把祖國取得的進步作為一個榜樣，一個在這個新時代我們能夠帶給世界上不幸地區的榜樣。 +25% State migration pull
工會	合法怠工負責人似乎希望我們閉嘴，只照吩咐去做，毫無自主思想。讓我們看看，如果我們真的把這種哲學貫徹到我們「無需技能」的勞動中，他們會怎麼看。 −15% Construction Efficiency	產業骨幹不管是誰來負責，是工人們的合作方式最終對工廠的運作狀況產生了更大的影響，而不是高層制定的任何規則。 +10% Manufacturing throughput	團結所有想要工作的人都應該有工作！任何人都不應被排除在外。我們必須相互支持，保障每個人的權利，才能獲得和付出勞動對等的報酬。 +10% Workforce ratio